IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial"

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 07 May 2021 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1D3A2BE5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=gjBx7pho; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=NklxRAQp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VQ09B0Tgx4D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1CA3A2BA9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 55260 invoked from network); 7 May 2021 17:39:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=d7d0.60957b6e.k2105; bh=Sc/yVK7E4RWRoNRZZjyYquE9Kl/vCcQK130YCbsPpa8=; b=gjBx7phoITQnit+5HRcAvVq2GLicMTgW0IqSkVZHmrIu1y1mcHOkFkrTSsuxsB+s37NqqCrewXS8lKsIe/wNdRGP6HV338ujl8xQtdORVBbzeLLQvSi/aUJGoabKEa81oOJA8eYHVKCaFRnRC0Db/wJ8/S8dAUCPduGQ9dc7Yv7eT1xm+I68yrpLELaAQ/CXJn79Cix8T3dBhz7cihuFaqNsFxFEE1SZOzHTYh9aBZrrNZTLlRy19ByXyCmu4QFOLodvbfdMAENfW4Yt/oPHC9igwiW8DvLoKsHOiQhBDa+nqbbAyzPSuFhYsDyawVUXt3yg0slnI6H1zp9Q/KCRnw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=d7d0.60957b6e.k2105; bh=Sc/yVK7E4RWRoNRZZjyYquE9Kl/vCcQK130YCbsPpa8=; b=NklxRAQpo32ThYBgrbFAXfAbzKsHFc2bPf3uq3bb/PkFXf9K5pKevEio/m8H5jvBKZWtYv8ot7OyRTezefX459lv/buV1GmP9csa+a5nXABuL4MEXmWqxZfXYNcqkmB61soJio0ik5bnRQRa+Xp20H322gvZPLGEL4h3SEufTT1Ufvyxk0NUFgh891h8YchpSxydhWWTS/ErfYu7WBZ511UCUAXUbzNokNoRmDv9LHjNOpCwbxMsJMUKoQdTpxvVfqQR/d09nJpz5E0Ja1sJbMC2ceRmzJ8W22jcI2L5l/J+adCwoXx4B60/CqEe1cCxmJ4QR4vHAjX6bVMiUFJjow==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 May 2021 17:39:58 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 90C147221D3; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:39:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 13:39:56 -0400
Message-Id: <20210507173957.90C147221D3@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: hsalgado@nic.cl
In-Reply-To: <20210507164749.GC91746@pepino>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Q8trbH_qO2gYZoFKvTc4LmCzeJ0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:40:20 -0000

It appears that Hugo Salgado  <hsalgado@nic.cl> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I'll upload a new version to revive it, and ask for a slot
>in IETF111 for further discussion!

It looks like it's worth considering, but I also wonder how
relevant it is for DNS servers that don't use AXFR/IXFR and SOA
serial numbers to keep versions in sync.

I put serial numnbers in my zones but in fact my servers use
rsync from a hidden master so the serials don't tell you much.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email