IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial"

Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br> Fri, 07 May 2021 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fneves@registro.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B053A2BEE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BwjhHHbypW8L for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clone.registro.br (clone.registro.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:2::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1463A2BE7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87968780969; Fri, 7 May 2021 14:55:00 -0300 (-03)
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:55:00 -0300
From: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, hsalgado@nic.cl
Message-ID: <YJV+9H6ellaAP+jv@registro.br>
References: <20210507164749.GC91746@pepino> <20210507173957.90C147221D3@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210507173957.90C147221D3@ary.qy>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yb30JIllrzGFFCE2KbheFl_fHxE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:55:09 -0000

On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 01:39:56PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Hugo Salgado  <hsalgado@nic.cl> said:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >I'll upload a new version to revive it, and ask for a slot
> >in IETF111 for further discussion!
> 
> It looks like it's worth considering, but I also wonder how
> relevant it is for DNS servers that don't use AXFR/IXFR and SOA
> serial numbers to keep versions in sync.

In that case not much, but for many that uses in-band zone transfer
mechanisms it is very relevant. Specially in the case that the serial
in a zone is time deterministic.

Fred

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email