IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 29 September 2016 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7FD12B0E1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kk4pQ8CEXxD6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4C112B063 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 501E031C79; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:21:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37069EC0B1D; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:26:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:26:38 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Message-ID: <20160928212638.GD4192@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20160920161350.GA3288@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20160923082232.6j2jlr4wqp2fxs56@nic.fr> <7F671C9C-BEEC-479B-99FB-8618C3C75526@powerdns.com> <CAN6NTqyCuLQJ=aYCfxiLPyRgoMR2CQDwtpsSSt499wA3Y_168A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAN6NTqyCuLQJ=aYCfxiLPyRgoMR2CQDwtpsSSt499wA3Y_168A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ReFyJ-D2PRjjYd3O4DVQs4n-xBg>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:21:29 -0000

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:33:39PM +0100,
 Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com> wrote 
 a message of 148 lines which said:

> The RCODE applies to the RRSET pointed to by the last CNAME in answer
> section (or the missing one).

This specific case was settled in RFC 6604 and I did not intend to
reopen it. My problem was with the definition of QNAME, not with the
proper rcode for a chain of CNAME.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email