IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests

Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org> Sat, 03 October 2015 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <grothoff@gnunet.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D69A1B3040 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yddk6a0edPrx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A292F1B303F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,629,1437429600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="180893120"
Received: from arennes-650-1-82-170.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO [192.168.1.14]) ([81.53.113.170]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 03 Oct 2015 21:53:06 +0200
Message-ID: <5610321B.5000308@gnunet.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:52:59 +0200
From: Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <56102BF4.1090206@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56102BF4.1090206@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UaqHir4Cr4PbEosCTOFls3F9Ur3qgoSt2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UOUM2UILwBlnp5B6N4P7X2F-qck>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:53:10 -0000

Dear Tim,

I'm sorry to hear you had to go into rehab, but despite threatening your
recovery, let me remind you that your WG update fails to mention the P2P
name drafts.  Could you please publicly state how IETF plans to proceed
with those?

I'm again asking DNSOP to be fair and follow the same process we used
for .onion for the other P2P special-use names.


Thanks!

Christian

On 10/03/2015 09:26 PM, Tim WIcinski wrote:
> 
> Since we (the chairs) took the summer recovering from the .onion IETF
> Last Call,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email