Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Sat, 03 October 2015 22:02 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0831B2EEA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5K2UAihUxqA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505EB1A8A4E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE3A1FCC37; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:02:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92EA3160047; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8010C16007E; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id y120XVQ6vWES; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-161-187.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.161.187]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C9CD160047; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AE1392E377; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 09:01:59 +1100 (EST)
To: Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <56102BF4.1090206@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:26:44 -0400." <56102BF4.1090206@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 09:01:59 +1100
Message-Id: <20151003220159.99AE1392E377@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DbH_lCsR7vH7462Jq_7t_fIsaZU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:02:09 -0000
I see no mention of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303 which was last called Dec 07, 1013 [1] and is still awaiting writeup. Am I going to have to rev the document a forth time just to keep it alive? [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg10886.html -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Age… Tim WIcinski
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94… Christian Grothoff
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong