IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-00.txt

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Sun, 04 October 2015 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680D1A03A3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6u2_ARL64w0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [207.136.192.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BDF1B32FD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 07:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 29B8F3F447; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 10:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22033.14483.72522.295726@gro.dd.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 10:32:51 -0400
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151001050850.GA51763@isc.org>
References: <20150930190405.17300.40441.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/t2mmC-C5c1r51eBKCM6M978c5Ms>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:32:55 -0000

A couple of quick observations:

* The draft says that the answer in a signed zone MAY be unsigned.
  Since this will ultimately cause a SERVFAIL for validating
  resolvers, it is not really acceptable.

* The draft does not describe at all what the proper behaviour is for
  an owner name that has a CNAME record.  Since CNAMEs require special
  handling, this should be addressed.  Personally I think the CNAME
  should be returned in this case.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email