[DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests

Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 03 October 2015 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C241B2C77 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zH53MBuE3n_7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430741B2C6B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so136649830pad.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PbExha3ad1qcpFI2as88TDXEzcJ3qMBBktrN1JC497A=; b=XnVVPCNKWPUA5BFvWubIHZ+PFTBDDOP4yMedeE8EVAGGpp/NPAeRgeEVVxO9l3oY24 UeMmPrR4qsrzmbT0jEC8qFbevACsuwQP+//476mOIcbfN2XrCKue5PjCyO2jjMggUbl3 wkG8bzi3gKUPcvNgmEsfpIqpg+0Kg0Ks0ME1MpCO2xGWMhAqKI0dy0eBzDX2W7KWTUXU EBi7bwC+AyY96W8/9JcMDBsiWcPXl5k7uTe5YQXoDNf2G06o7uxuM1CXdqqs/4oDovXx lmMBLsDPggcouO5gNSbbDr7ozouDQND9LuIhKLaYa97xgKohnaAwO6eI9iBvNgZ7h0X8 lj8A==
X-Received: by 10.68.254.7 with SMTP id ae7mr28897933pbd.131.1443900406662; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from static-219-169.meetings.nanog.org (static-219-169.meetings.nanog.org. [199.187.219.169]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ux7sm18911681pac.10.2015.10.03.12.26.45 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56102BF4.1090206@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:26:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Vj-4WCdxRPb6Q1cszl3IizBCkeU>
Subject: [DNSOP] DNSOP Working Group Update and IETF94 Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:26:49 -0000

Hi


Since we (the chairs) took the summer recovering from the .onion IETF 
Last Call,   I wanted to update the working group on what has been 
accomplished and what is currently outstanding.

	The Negative-Trust-Anchor draft is now RFC7646.

	The root-loopback draft is getting ready to be published.

	The dns-terminology draft is in the RFC Editor Queue.

Along with the key-timing and .onion drafts, the Working Group will have 
published 9 drafts this year.  We want to thank you for all your work. 
However, we are not done:

We have *two* Working Group Last Calls on documents that have been 
through a major discussion process, but received *no* mention during the 
process:

      draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-05
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation/


      draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-05
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies/


The chairs feel these documents are done and ready to move forward. But 
it does seem bad form to just act unilaterally.

We have one document in Call for Adoption.

      draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns/

The author has addressed many comments and concerns raised since IETF91 
(Honolulu), and the chairs feel that all concerns have been addressed 
and should be adopted.  Again, there has been no comments since starting 
call for adoption.

—

We have several drafts which have been steadily being worked on and are 
ready for Working Group Last Call:

      draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/

      draft-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive/

      draft-dnsop-ietf-dnsop-5966bis
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis/

alt-tld may be waiting for keeping RFC6761 discussions, but the other 
tcp-keepalive is more than ready, and 5966bis is ready once I give it 
another editorial read.

—

Saying all of this, we’re putting out  a call for agenda items for 
Yokohama.   Please send your request to dnsop-chairs@ietf.org

We plan on spending the next month(s) moving the levers of the process 
forward.

thanks

tim