IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 05 August 2019 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65112012B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emZztRQcOU95 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFA2120123 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461ygG54g3zFB5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 02:04:26 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1564963466; bh=hSUxfSRyztVMEUw405zGtDEjVvD3zQWglSV+hIuxUOQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VD4tJ0y7Hel6LJ/e1aKIkIMwF7CAzcgziohxOfYHSUvnzrCV91V1QoJ7luJgAkL8G OJJ6gGifqTpACpo0Os8a3GNYuiaqQHHNeC33EWwBRwulrZKJTE0H40/jHjMgoME/aw /3L/H+gnwYjQ7xPHvDrFcJ/muwA9JqixGG/4tZOY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKJ35bdOqXK7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 02:04:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 02:04:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D85B3159D4; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 20:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 8D85B3159D4
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F75F40A7021 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 20:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 20:04:22 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sx4AaTVivX+re+VYeKaF-UJ+6=+oHMreR3JwCiRq1sikA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1908041959350.9876@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+EUk_Qmnk=x3-om1OMjSMFrhd9qFUKTEBk6qWjh6fgRXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sx4AaTVivX+re+VYeKaF-UJ+6=+oHMreR3JwCiRq1sikA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UZNGuIObfvcwPuzaErK024QVyzs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-sah-resolver-information
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:04:31 -0000

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:04 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sah-resolver-information/
> 
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

I'm okay with adopting it, but I do think some work needs to be done for
the document. One example is the sentence "acts as if it is delegated"
and then shows how to override a delegated answer.

It is also a little weird that the document starts a new registry,
and than fails to put in a single entry.

But the WG can work on those,

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email