IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Mon, 10 May 2021 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCD13A2504 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcB3KwlvwFpg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0AD3A2500 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D6FD140AE2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:45:58 +0200 (CEST)
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <bfaa3ab3-3d96-dcec-a175-5803de03d852@NLnetLabs.nl>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <eb62e04b-2511-ac14-b2e1-c29eab64acfc@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 19:45:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bfaa3ab3-3d96-dcec-a175-5803de03d852@NLnetLabs.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Wkul5atTbvw4BBN-x6KCcvZhj7k>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:46:08 -0000

I like the document, but the section on validators recommends not to 
follow requirements from RFC 5155, so I don't expect that best-practice 
track is sufficient.  And I do think we need a similar update to 5155, 
be it in this document or a separate one.

I'd also expect something on limits accepted by secondaries.  And some 
details are probably up to further discussion (e.g. particular numbers 
and SERVFAIL), but I don't think such details would block adoption.

--Vladimir | knot-resolver.cz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email