IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 26 November 2014 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBD91A0195 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:02:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9immv_DaYh51 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF131A0143 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-143.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sAQG20JD093009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:02:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-143.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.143] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <2014112617115615567471@cnnic.cn>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:02:00 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C37910D1-4923-42E2-BC26-2F472F24C0D6@vpnc.org>
References: <54691B0A.6060508@gmail.com> <2014112617115615567471@cnnic.cn>
To: yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X_KMMsrTbNzoEnWOHW7oSBhM6d0
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:02:13 -0000

On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> Are the functions of this kind of recursive resolvers similar to the slave server of the root?

Yes, of course. As defined in the document, the local root server has exactly the root server data in it, and acts like an authoritative server.

> The root slave server gets the latest info from root master server, serving many recursive server.

That is not the design in the draft. In the draft, the root server on the loopback can only serve one recursive server, namely the one on the same host.

> This kind of "root slave server " gets the latest info from root  servers, serving only local recursive server.

Correct: "serving only local recursive server", not "serving many recursive server".

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email