IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 20 November 2014 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C921A1BBD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:25:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcNnuvY1oKXv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9811A86FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:25:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-111.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sAKIPMvY037654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:25:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-111.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.111] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8A2nnMWfOt=8w0waG0BDpR=qRBjB098fzDaU31Cv4fJ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:25:22 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CF7CA3A5-6C2A-459C-8DFB-32DC3807DADE@vpnc.org>
References: <54691B0A.6060508@gmail.com> <54692F7A.6030803@dougbarton.us> <20141117071250.GA55492@isc.org> <546A73B6.2060005@dougbarton.us> <20141117225045.GA35924@isc.org> <546A873F.8060402@dougbarton.us> <546E2287.7080909@dougbarton.us> <DCE8D121-A9D7-40A6-9567-39DF6811A50F@vpnc.org> <CA+nkc8A2nnMWfOt=8w0waG0BDpR=qRBjB098fzDaU31Cv4fJ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/q8IWCiLhj3ldr1rv2Ey1Kr5xUuo
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:25:55 -0000

On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote:
> I can see where "validate on zone transfer" would be a feature request.  And "validate everything" similarly.
> 
> For the draft, could a small paragraph be added explaining the difference between using a separate view for the root zone and just loading it in the same view, so that people like me realize the tradeoffs before we decide to implement the draft with what we might think is a minor simplification, not realizing the impact?

Yes, we can add this to the BIND example in the appendices. Given that I kinda suck at BIND, proposed wording would cause less grief in the next draft...

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email