IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Thu, 20 November 2014 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D116A1A1A2A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgW15rGEo8LO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5FC1A1A11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ft15so3515142pdb.36 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=zKN99hHmvg0WR0pbxCg1T5dVqGEz225KRIxengNRmUI=; b=M40bg3qQDkOFR7IW/sOU3YQHv5ldbJ6juVryc3G3witVJF8/DtWJQic9hQCNn0LAEY 1qnHxgwbIlBxSlPLSV+9yGaoYfBQcp9U6hyQGnfKJ01bVaL9wSgbcOgRoqQBgoOmxCai nr6/aAKfN7oJHc5+jH/B6zeBk3r7G/Xz1qBeu+FpqWCjCHIgNSX8HAvamY2YqUkIQlU3 qNWTcoNdg81eLYOFsZbKnuxgSJFCzYrksUer/XCu/a0mVI3tIvT9BE7Vi96sLw8Vowuv 33z+MSrDH2XwjezSNz2CkBzJImcgXUoR0bUVR0vfIVauLdkmqefN82mm6I8P0UbI6ktp HVUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmi2Oo1W6Xlx/nR7WQixWIhpYciR1xx8jz1rHMh49IO5o+xjQiFjlvG9ogu9X9xylkMhLzH
X-Received: by 10.70.44.70 with SMTP id c6mr58027621pdm.45.1416508070191; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::2d0:110:791a:c3e5:2cbe:27a4? ([2620:0:2d0:110:791a:c3e5:2cbe:27a4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw5sm2688726pbc.9.2014.11.20.10.27.48 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21B60B0D-0C1E-4224-ACF5-91C03D02C850"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888D574C2FD@EXCH-02.CORP.CIRA.CA>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:27:47 -0800
Message-Id: <42578B01-D07A-44C3-9DDC-440B8DA8341F@virtualized.org>
References: <54691B0A.6060508@gmail.com> <54692F7A.6030803@dougbarton.us> <20141117071250.GA55492@isc.org> <546A73B6.2060005@dougbarton.us> <20141117225045.GA35924@isc.org> <546A873F.8060402@dougbarton.us> <FE0CA17E-0702-4A8A-B25D-ADC88AE94E78@icsi.berkeley.edu> <86CC9DD3-6804-4F94-831E-DD408C89EECA@vpnc.org> <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888D574C2FD@EXCH-02.CORP.CIRA.CA>
To: Jacques Latour <jacques.latour@cira.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qU8vr9WNv2-5RA88CB2SiuGBsF4
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:27:53 -0000

Jacques,

On Nov 20, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Jacques Latour <jacques.latour@cira.ca> wrote:
> I think the one big drawback for me is the loss visibility and control for the root operators.

Lack of comprehensive statistics would indeed be an issue (I'm not going to comment on the "control" bit of your assertion), however...

> As an example, DITL, what value will that have if only subset of queries make it to root servers?

The current DITL data is a subset of queries.  

> Will DNS-OARC have to collect logs from all these loopback authoritative slave recursive?  

All? No. However, I suspect if DNS-OARC asked, they might be able to get a sufficient number of operators to volunteer their data to provide a statistically valid sample.

> -1 for adoption.

Is that the only reason you don't think the draft should be adopted?

You are aware that some large resolver operators already do what is documented in root-loopback, right?

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email