IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Introducing draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free

Marek Vavruša <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com> Sat, 26 March 2016 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0954412D55F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H914WonCoeNH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6432E12D1A9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i4so8260148qkc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=JH9gBHTCcXvsVgTJqCiv9PDYzAy6uHwSdf9mW7Kk2Rw=; b=NE3hjYHiCGLDtKpGvo3chfuaM/5vzrMQgLge5xniF6otUU+LHPMsJ16GqJ0tDW2yw3 8B7UP0RDWZV9WO8dLAy64EuqP9n0REsjOZ9ximTiQP1gBQLxGf0uBVsmNFPKc8DuV8K2 nT79n77hedPAur94RKaHUD3OspDtHsWFKR9jg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=JH9gBHTCcXvsVgTJqCiv9PDYzAy6uHwSdf9mW7Kk2Rw=; b=jdB6UL+lkr3JL06BsFi3cP/yHhpqS0Ovid+kTLhwEte+oEyiDyz0Yvcbtu/OyoPgiN k5ngZN+eoQWg6h6aq1eLvAY8ozlqyMyqjianviisgXvPgInnunX69o2or26jDA23YTAe eNR/d1se1/4dY5GkX2d6zQrzROxPFqOMs42JZBBAJC/0cOAp/fJlXCiZjkfddyEjEYdM CbnzBYcyih1/ocradxXJoOZIu/vO0+Gf0ytmgm9H+ghKJQqMVuN2ToU2ERpaVsvsydw2 Kidp4F0O5vfaw/QzhHnFL2CNxcK6L6qlw6vuxAyZhkpczTPaXcS+G7I/rs6+94nT1fsV bOpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLBeqKuquvnsH7fqDRIHhiNgduI0Ang316rmW0xXRn/uptfO6JVECJm2rytpqwstULBPSFozsrmCr79c/CL
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.231.9 with SMTP id e9mr1062815ybh.148.1458960981493; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.35.130 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160326025121.14477.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20160325230119.GA5239@mx2.yitter.info> <20160326025121.14477.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:56:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAC=TB13iuvXqf2XpaCtM0e46uqfBQeRwKxAeODJrM8mVpOap2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marek Vavruša <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b14bc0b3f45052eead3be"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XuBAPjbuQcFussHr0_hKBT3TAdQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Introducing draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 02:56:26 -0000

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:51 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >As I think many here know, I am not of the get-off-my-lawn persuasion
> >for DNS innovations.  I don't think it's a bad idea in principle.  I'm
> >just aware that we have this long history, and that history was based
> >on a certain kind of conservatism that is arguably appropriate to a
> >technology quite as fundamental to the Internet functioning as the DNS
> >is.  If we're going to abandon that conservatism, I think it needs
> >quite a lot more early IETF buy-in than we might get by developing
> >this work here in DNSOP.  The more signal we can get to suggest that
> >DNS actors are ok with the innovation, the lower I think that bar gets.
>
> I'd be a lot more comfortable if we had some field test data about
> what real DNS caches do with the extra AAAA records.  In theory
> nothing bad should happen, in practice ...
>
> R's,
> John


I agree, working on it.

Marek

_______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email