Re: [DNSOP] Introducing draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 26 March 2016 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4FA12D12C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wyrds0ONTb6Q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D88E12D0EB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 79142 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2016 02:51:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Mar 2016 02:51:43 -0000
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 02:51:21 -0000
Message-ID: <20160326025121.14477.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20160325230119.GA5239@mx2.yitter.info>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YzQNA5jc8M_LCB5Nm0QW9HGe7RY>
Cc: ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Introducing draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 02:51:46 -0000

>As I think many here know, I am not of the get-off-my-lawn persuasion
>for DNS innovations.  I don't think it's a bad idea in principle.  I'm
>just aware that we have this long history, and that history was based
>on a certain kind of conservatism that is arguably appropriate to a
>technology quite as fundamental to the Internet functioning as the DNS
>is.  If we're going to abandon that conservatism, I think it needs
>quite a lot more early IETF buy-in than we might get by developing
>this work here in DNSOP.  The more signal we can get to suggest that
>DNS actors are ok with the innovation, the lower I think that bar gets.

I'd be a lot more comfortable if we had some field test data about
what real DNS caches do with the extra AAAA records.  In theory
nothing bad should happen, in practice ...

R's,
John