IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 10 March 2020 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870BF3A12A3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSsR0-rlL_29 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 523253A12A4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id x22so10802260lff.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bTaP0LMLAmD4XynkYWz+xBz1DgA9/OxfCZ8B3ZJtyO0=; b=UZhu5Cnbg+OLUsPYNzG7mseVFqBcaZf81+036dGzUP92QAFqb6TEQw4vITLt7YSSwJ mJBscAqf9UHdcASO/OxYRHWQ+bLILLmlORGg5xZb0w07cGnMQCKYRD8r74bqWCZHNHaT wmipipIzClg0nlTZ4uQJ5AXdFiwBuihRgaI/w/4CrFOyLMxJg08VbXv1ej7sTpnas3xt G3/zOZS6KyIJdNt2QbB8o99Ywn0ZcwdGKe9KRNFdozCQ586n0NdqIYvvX7uEXGX6UCN7 puxmGTSXbWd31y6TVuB5F0SUP9eJ6Ebch3NnDakKljfvF+vdV2CKtB1DuYCzJwqXw0U+ juUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bTaP0LMLAmD4XynkYWz+xBz1DgA9/OxfCZ8B3ZJtyO0=; b=J9tfqyAsDZE3stI1pktEq75XMJHXNDmoOIRoBrEYVMB8OhnqMw9VCMF58eXFZ7gEQG JQgyTlxptU5KtTjSfuwHQhSXNvUfvX/bJkNXsPqvXVzpHKliBHewJN024jSynJxzNKWt puy9BxLD9my1Npx+CVhxmMbmYxmR23woy79ke3jlegetGAl5tu3kNr5tWIscaA9/313S PmJ0fjCx2PSYEltzO6f5RhaLRDdAQ91Ezkcg1R+udWdWN4srsZ82skdaKgLdcxLrFE8U HIH5v0pP+x3t+FDYT7AmvlNxe3DMOR+NLK7p4KRvnXTVAHmt4jyHVfqaSA4HCJW7mdOs v7aQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3i0Na+P/rUGV3NKUrATqYtmHdksJ0R9G8UAtnUUY9SuAGjv/B5 hxEKukbOWGmo0AJL0k4ReDJO4WSB2W3gejzR+JAP4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvgKwYmD5SvsQTTxfcUKvvbqvXdBFve1anQBUuE+EFrMkTANEvQMDAeen7oMMkqGGMBVBEzMg4UED3enOGUE5g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:305:: with SMTP id t5mr11487338lfp.104.1583845499052; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iLFuSbdA2TFS4Qd2dAzDFJyJgfQGY1+T2c2JQZ3WTat_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdUUeLx59B0SrzmFazd_rqUm1kU-ARG-LBEYa4jFQyaH3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdWu_Sx50QodaT27b1BLaBty_qKO57jybbgybdP16CLnFw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdWu_Sx50QodaT27b1BLaBty_qKO57jybbgybdP16CLnFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:04:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLsEDbB9yHUpgoddCQv_yEiTuZ0CP9=K7tZNh614DLzmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YpWhpKhn7Iyw7IzavHz1qgRqA6w>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:05:07 -0000

Thank you - IETF LC has been started.
W

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:48 PM Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:21 PM Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:24 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> Firstly, thank you for a well written and easy to understand document.
>>>
>>> I have some comments which I think should be addressed before I start
>>> IETF LC, but they are small enough that if you'd much prefer you can
>>> just address them after during / after LC (if changes are needed), or
>>> during IESG review.
>
>
> Warren,
>
> New draft revision has been pushed out addressing your comments (and also the topic of disjoint algorithms that Matthijs Mekking and I discussed on list).
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04
>
> Shumon.
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email