IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Mon, 27 January 2020 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439C53A0A43; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:28:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhJF6DgXZTl3; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597DF3A0A3E; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:27:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 66so9551103otd.9; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:27:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uf8Pxa50Qe8s2d4R2t9BMzwPqWcWzjHzE48uT+1A9w8=; b=iYYAgG9IubwGBMIlTmvgN+M3PqBuAM9tY5yk09ZrN0AZtpYc+43VOB+z0mBe62VECa 10NYhdu75Nx29+AoU8NmqgOd9NXubYtnem29b3pbikL6tCS3erKmK6/p4dQ6jtiopfe2 fc7RxcyIBIIsx+9CCgjXeeyrScnXwxMIJkFbx8CZC1w+GZJXMTmMQnsgrJnS0/Yv2UiG 5tchWMDr8u8c7DqkoaB8IBhQCgZsnwZBl+V/Fd65faynoqoNzen2asVP7jx4Z61X/Ii+ iici4zChFHh4OjLAilBfZeH60M6Uj+mPNlwFjSIdiACB4FUduhXedfRG9sERqrUMXgLB xd6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uf8Pxa50Qe8s2d4R2t9BMzwPqWcWzjHzE48uT+1A9w8=; b=CIPN4v8yX0NrVJ7+z9Jtub4ZLR3k0VNTf0X6z+5OXK1DYg0Okctw2kz/LdBKsDKPSH QxmddQ9CgYmDnPaeXtYkXy7cuIxdemE1ck5p1cShozzz0nFBut02YHJYNq1UnLM3VXXD oX70K+OP11S2gprLz7km0WrGFWSEwnO8C8HppN8FnSsfFFdB8aFEYQWlgkj55StoSCdj 8ta9z7wW/1bYvkMqB01IZ/wOYH3rX/rThkTaYBCwLq8jHf6AAyk1PG/TRtl/JbMxtzCb NeGD0ZnYwoNSNQHU/0a0gfG0lhUUkNvGzevX17ZFEOZd3Eog8AbAEZXgWuGFLgvx16Br l5EQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbxSzlqdS0fJaS1I824iA+O23M4LwqqWofZA3jRwcgC2bcQ7Qs MWsCHxzicDVppNip6CI+j898fKpS7MNO9EBI7Gc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSRJiZR0MGGnqA1SeRMvmBF7oxxLgRYIDdAvSEp8EZP8ixZ0mm3uL6RuFSsMLA5v7CXEIiKMIf0+LO56O4WxQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:4a7:: with SMTP id l7mr12873693otd.372.1580153276091; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:27:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iLFuSbdA2TFS4Qd2dAzDFJyJgfQGY1+T2c2JQZ3WTat_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdUUeLx59B0SrzmFazd_rqUm1kU-ARG-LBEYa4jFQyaH3Q@mail.gmail.com> <3fb01cba-9558-531c-5764-9c34b111545b@pletterpet.nl> <CAHPuVdWNAJbGm=j96149Sb9gig1QuAyCXyVbsZY0BzhpP_DV3g@mail.gmail.com> <20200121163109.GC98497@registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <20200121163109.GC98497@registro.br>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:27:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdVLVZ=7F=6BQVCBqR65Cgawb1x-GCJm2b8rV-6hk3cyAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
Cc: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>, draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec@ietf.org, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b652b7059d241ad4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kbb2Kq3QMxfyxMdNTyZMGrtMjqk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:28:02 -0000

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:31 AM Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
wrote:

> Hi Shumon,
> [...]
> Actually the algorithm rollover, following the liberal approach, is a
> pure double signing process. With TTLs tuned it is during a short
> interval but still double signing the zone.
>
> ftp://ftp.registro.br/pub/gts/gts32/01-br-algorithm-rollover.pdf
>
>
Hi Fred - thanks for this. I guess I misunderstood your report when I
originally read it.


> >
> > This also begs the question: should we (in another document) update RFC
> > 4035, Section 2 (last paragraph) to relax or eliminate the rule, if in
> fact
> > it is being ignored?
>
> I guess 6840 sec 5.11 already clarifies it. 4035 sec 2.2 is talking
> about signers.
>

Yeah, it clarifies it in a somewhat contradictory (and not required for
interoperability) way though. I'll elaborate in another reply to Matthijs ..

-- 
Shumon.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email