Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 13 March 2015 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178531A8AA8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qr13NWjjh6S9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C511A8855 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2DG0ZZ7009856 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:00:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdXaNT7-_53WcMnb1DsfePN=XfER0oFV_5AAWjPmBpCTYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:00:34 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AE4A82A9-A52F-42CC-870E-3E8F86573191@vpnc.org>
References: <m2vbi6ju6z.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <915A7EEB-CA46-41DC-AAC1-1B26E5BB227C@vpnc.org> <CAHPuVdXaNT7-_53WcMnb1DsfePN=XfER0oFV_5AAWjPmBpCTYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: shuque@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_VhON_xZgFPAwcpnYaxp8iKmIks>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:00:41 -0000

On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:39 AM, Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might be worth also clarifying another thing. The definition states "These
> RRs are only necessary if", but doesn't clearly include or exclude the possibility
> that other address records for NS names that don't sit below the zone cut, and 
> were gratuitously provided in the referral response, qualify to be  called 'glue'. I 
> think  they should not be called glue (they don't meet my intuitive understanding 
> of the meaning of 'glue', as gluing up a hole in the resolution path). But clarity on 
> this point would be welcome.

If there is a well-accepted name for "address records that come with glue records but are not actually glue records", we can add it, but I am hesitant for this document becoming a list of things observed in the wild that don't already have names.

FWIW, what we tentatively have for the next draft is:

   Glue records -- Resource records which are not part of the
   authoritative data [for a zone], and are address resource records for
   the servers [in a subzone].  These RRs are only necessary if the name
   server's name is "below" the cut, and are only used as part of a
   referral response.  (Definition from RFC 1034, section 4.2.1)

--Paul Hoffman