Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> Fri, 13 March 2015 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <casey@deccio.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAB11A1BA7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBgD28xddyMa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CE51A1B34 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so120159569iec.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deccio.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mkyragQmAuGsm1J8x0Eh/eRDLk+e+BfhIHuIjR2wIUU=; b=JzrXdrMoiO9yMn9pBC1XNVi3oeM0DF40SW8GtoaFOLlSudZLuecvSHWdMzMbKjbXhG 87SuwWlmXuZovTdhRg583q8ElPPOHmQrPQ2g2gpWOIMBsCusYXU5fOWBcQq1M8SvC86b 92rHMRvcAtKiv1OJVr4fPgjcT9yun3MPEulLM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mkyragQmAuGsm1J8x0Eh/eRDLk+e+BfhIHuIjR2wIUU=; b=Zx97apa3llqR3eLh3Iq2NNv4i5m5YfAa5w+xfm+WPbzgBce4loqBZ0/t6lxK+DGjpl 4advwwGhYnAkZIcDWHQhwrbg4lIge7z6dIKLHkz2A4lyWXWwQESW9GMPt26AQlwBbj4e pN51849v+fvuLhBiXa5cg1YfH7PtagM4xcQwpOnpUvytsYCxFvlQd+akJqY3wJvA5q7K eJOJh8O/rpV+z8tBejlatPzOUdQ5YgImB4V4uuHmK3+19AaKutlsRFrbNQ33U6tlgEkr UQG/EcwlGRaeMTzfQLieFS9rcr6GJY6yNhL6/HPovweHjT0ncNBzWuYHlN5Ff3NDri0p 41EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcn+RlKpyvezKk5FyF78PH6RJCD4PVOAI34VQvDJPkJyXz70qThckxCGXEcGR5iT0EUIv6
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.128.226 with SMTP id k95mr1153329ioi.73.1426277636702; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.57.233 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D3D9B423-8A7A-4703-882A-12DE4CB490C0@vpnc.org>
References: <m2vbi6ju6z.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <915A7EEB-CA46-41DC-AAC1-1B26E5BB227C@vpnc.org> <E63D7C23-577C-4AA1-BE00-F90BD9E6E64E@blipp.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1503121758100.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <D3D9B423-8A7A-4703-882A-12DE4CB490C0@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:13:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEKtLiS5PyMhEwUK7jY_CKSDYr+UOtD3cp_6JDLp6cSuN_DkQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f9ae4e31dac051131238e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pLqNsAGLJy5sob3noYmij-da8AU>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS Terminology: Glue
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:14:12 -0000

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> >
> > Patrik Wallström <pawal@blipp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Glue Name Records are defined as all NS records pertaining to the child
> >> domain that are delivered by the nameservers for the parent domain.
> >>
> >> Glue Address Records are all A or AAAA records pertaining to the child
> >> domain that are delivered by the nameservers for the parent domain
> >
> > That's nice and clear.
> >
> > I use the term "delegation NS records" and reserve "glue records" for the
> > address records.
>
> My reading of 1034 is the same as Tony's. I don't seen in 1034 where the
> delegating NS records would qualify as "glue" at all.
>
>
I use the same terminology also (i.e., "delegation NS records" vs. "glue
records").

But it should be noted that within existing RFCs the terminology differs:

RFC 1034 4.2.1:

    ..."glue" RRs which are not
    part of the authoritative data, and are address RRs for the servers.

RFC 1034 4.2.2:

   ...delegation NS RRs and glue RRs

but:

RFC 2181 5.4.1:

   "Glue" above includes any record in a zone file that is not properly
   part of that zone, including nameserver records of delegated sub-
   zones (NS records), address records that accompany those NS records
   (A, AAAA, etc), and any other stray data that might appear.


It's unclear whether "'glue' above" means "glue, for the purposes of this
document" or "glue, which we are restating the definition of", but it
sounds to me like the latter.  In any case, the definition differs from
that previously stated (and my own understanding).

Casey