Re: [dnsop] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-03.txt

Suzanne Woolf <Suzanne_Woolf@isc.org> Sun, 21 November 2004 18:34 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA12424 for <dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:34:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iALGuoVT026677; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iALGuoVA026676; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iALGunEX026644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by farside.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10265) id 2B6CC67503; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:56:44 +0000
From: Suzanne Woolf <Suzanne_Woolf@isc.org>
To: dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: [dnsop] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-03.txt
Message-ID: <20041121165643.GA29786@farside.isc.org>
References: <20041119215805.37460418A@thrintun.hactrn.net> <6.1.2.0.2.20041120155549.03b38d10@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20041120155549.03b38d10@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: owner-dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suzanne Woolf <Suzanne_Woolf@isc.org>

On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 04:09:32PM -0500, ?lafur Gu?mundsson wrote:
> At 16:58 19/11/2004, Rob Austein wrote:
> >This is a working group last call on the "Observed DNS Resolution
> >Misbehavior" draft, draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-03.txt, which we
> >hope to submit to the IESG for consideration as a BCP document.

I support publishing this draft as a BCP.

My only reservation is with the use of standards-track language in a
BCP. The recommendations are good and useful in substance, but I'm not
entirely comfortable that we're doing as much as we reasonably could
to discourage errant vendors in future. 

I don't want to see the draft held up on that account, though, so I'd
publish as-is and also open some discussion of whether the included
recommendations should be pursued as a separate standards-track
document (presumably in DNSEXT).
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html