IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00

Paul Ebersman <list-dnsop@dragon.net> Wed, 11 December 2013 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <list-dnsop@dragon.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610641AD9AB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:28:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwKk6RLRIjFj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:28:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dragon.net (mail.dragon.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB38D1AD93D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:28:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fafnir.remote.dragon.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873C23740C33 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0BBC72E46AFE; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:28:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from fafnir.remote.dragon.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065D32E46AF7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:28:37 -0700 (MST)
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Paul Ebersman <list-dnsop@dragon.net>
In-reply-to: <EC406A74-D342-46CD-8241-DEAFAE477319@hopcount.ca>
References: <52A329C4.8050501@teamaol.com> <E7568EE8-99D1-422B-9B24-40D6D0CFE118@virtualized.org> <EC406A74-D342-46CD-8241-DEAFAE477319@hopcount.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> message dated "Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:43:36 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:28:36 -0700
Message-Id: <20131211132837.0BBC72E46AFE@fafnir.remote.dragon.net>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:28:44 -0000

jabley> I would prefer the pragmatic option 5:

jabley> 5. Leave both registries as-is, publish Mark's document as-is,
jabley>    and work on a separate registry clean-up draft later, since I
jabley>    am guessing that work will not be uncontentious and the
jabley>    guidance provided by the draft at hand is sufficiently useful
jabley>    not to stall.

+1 for pragmatic approach and moving forward.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email