Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:42 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I am handling this document as responsible AD because Warren, who would
> otherwise do it, is <strike>irresponsible</strike> an author of the
> document.
>
> I have only two comments, below, that are total nits, and I will request
> last call as soon as I send this message.  Nice work, as always, Warren and
> Paul.
>

Awesome, thank you.
Please let me / us know if you would like a new version posted with the
below comments addressed, or if you would prefer we wait until after LC
ends.

Thanks again,
W



> Barry
>
> — Section 1.2 —
> It’s a small thing, but please use the BCP 14 boilerplate from RFC 8174
> exactly (you left out “NOT RECOMMENDED” here).
>
> — Section 4 —
>
>    As stated in Section 1, this design explicitly only allows the local
>    copy of the root zone information to be available only from resolvers
>
> Nit: you don’t need both “only”s.  I suggest removing the first one.
>
> --
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf