Re: [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

No reason to do it now; it can wait.

b

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:57 AM Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:42 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> I am handling this document as responsible AD because Warren, who would
>> otherwise do it, is <strike>irresponsible</strike> an author of the
>> document.
>>
>> I have only two comments, below, that are total nits, and I will request
>> last call as soon as I send this message.  Nice work, as always, Warren and
>> Paul.
>>
>
> Awesome, thank you.
> Please let me / us know if you would like a new version posted with the
> below comments addressed, or if you would prefer we wait until after LC
> ends.
>
> Thanks again,
> W
>
>
>
>> Barry
>>
>> — Section 1.2 —
>> It’s a small thing, but please use the BCP 14 boilerplate from RFC 8174
>> exactly (you left out “NOT RECOMMENDED” here).
>>
>> — Section 4 —
>>
>>    As stated in Section 1, this design explicitly only allows the local
>>    copy of the root zone information to be available only from resolvers
>>
>> Nit: you don’t need both “only”s.  I suggest removing the first one.
>>
>> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
> in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
> pants.
>    ---maf
>