Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary

Hi,

Thanks Ted, and more formally:

The WG has adopted https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tldr-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tldr-sutld-ps/> as a DNSOP working group document. As Ted said, the original authors are working on a revision to it, based on the discussion we just had for a first set of changes. It will be posted to the I-D repository as a work item for the WG.

Now that we have a problem statement, the authors are editors on behalf of the WG. The goal is a version of the problem statement that can be published as the WG consensus Informational RFC.

Beyond that the next task is to reach consensus on what steps, if any, the WG thinks the IETF should take to change the situation we’ve identified. (The chairs will need to provide some guidance on the respective roles of the IETF, the IAB, and the WG, but that’s more for discussion of solutions than for the problem statement, and a brief note from the chairs on it is already in the works.) 

thanks,
Suzanne (for the chairs)

> On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> New version of tldr draft is in the works.   When done, criticism
> solicited.   Please, please bear in mind that the point of this
> document is not to say what to do, but merely to enumerate as complete
> a set of problems as we can enumerate.   The point is not that we are
> going to solve every one of the problem documented in the draft, but
> that we want to identify all the problems people consider important,
> so that when we start to think about solutions, we can systematically
> evaluate how each part of a solution would impact each of the problems
> we've identified.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:44 AM, hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> wrote:
>> On 10/07/2016 08:56 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>> 
>>> Special Use Names Summary
>>> 
>> 
>> Hello DNSOP WG,
>> 
>> I let a week pass so that others can comment, but apparently this
>> summary didn't bring much of them.  Indeed I have a troubling issue with
>> it: how is that actionable?  IOW, what's next?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> ==
>> hk
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop