Re: [DNSOP] Tell me about the ISO 3166 user assigned two-letter codes and TLDs

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 02:23 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B15612B047 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=zwvYMiKq; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=cW9el3vf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7rPdNNA2kJr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CF312B03F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31588 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2016 02:23:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7b63.57ec7b21.k1609; bh=FSM8qBxrxe9dbvrb/rbMie+TDUAV5NWeHd6PC6vZ+tA=; b=zwvYMiKq3Z5w9229tsbi9RSNN0DpwZ7Q2dS+jpLIGzLyFCxR9jGoTwF2HwQwg2xHqO7IOCpCVTS8xqlukYY9WUQhnSO317BvwaGZpv4v5auiDANco3BPEA3JvaS1kPstag0+x4lKqjh9lug1gbzJBT3HCVKScDfn7Zf2Loy+A190vEyZuOWLUblf/3Qye0A4YbV7YrHivIAjaO/fAYF6017f2hg/yqZ/gvx9ijWvZON06irJA+O/+szc2Pe/aEo6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7b63.57ec7b21.k1609; bh=FSM8qBxrxe9dbvrb/rbMie+TDUAV5NWeHd6PC6vZ+tA=; b=cW9el3vf5878NLqCvaqoaf2+AK1ifrDZU0Lxuwng/5/pqZP7Lj+d+g+w5GbpYMOjUNb9Gv/WrcIws6aEx8uCx3Sb9h56VQLT14cG79oV3R0OEXqA7O3Po4yceo5MuQ0WPlGCnWS4sFk4QZTKdpEFp5LlnKm3lE34oJvq5xbR4mxsasWjh3mvHOf7E8bdqIwz+xmh0bGaKsBHdlOnWE8SIJ8EYeSxKDHPBUzqp3AXkKx3PscN8ndANZIlvkPMaNdY
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 29 Sep 2016 02:23:29 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:23:31 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609282206320.79752@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.57ec7400.3560da36.3a6@virtualized.org>
References: <20160928232720.9513.qmail@ary.lan> <etPan.57ec7400.3560da36.3a6@virtualized.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kyrv1pass8IjCxuqbcqnL-N0FZA>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Tell me about the ISO 3166 user assigned two-letter codes and TLDs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 02:23:35 -0000

> I've been telling people that if they need a fake private TLD for their local
?? network they should use one of those since it is exceedingly unlikely
?? ever to collide with a real DNS name. Am I right?
??
> I'd really like to say yes, but ISO-3166/MA appears to have removed references to "User Assigned" in their official ISO-3166 two letter code webpage. I'm trying to understand if they've changed their mind, but no answer yet.

The current list on the ISO web site completely omits those codes. 
They're not assigned, they're not unassigned, they're not reserved, 
they're not formerly assigned, they're not anything.

For about $40 one can buy a copy of ISO 3166-1:2013.  It's not clear from 
the TOC if it's any more informative.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly