IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt

Joseph Gersch <joe.gersch@secure64.com> Fri, 17 February 2012 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <joe.gersch@secure64.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C345521F853B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:16:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDDrEFiihqCt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com (unknown [64.92.221.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE58921F8545 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D07DB84B3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:59 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secure64.com
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.secure64.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7IxuHJ4KsSQ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:58 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.138.15.34] (unknown [192.168.254.4]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B84B8495 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:58 -0700 (MST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=secure64.com; s=2010; t=1329499018; bh=14l6M7RGb30NE16MwWg0kuQTRZRDJTOycL4F+CRQZNg=; h=From:Content-Type:Subject:Date:References:To:Message-Id: Mime-Version; b=kTop2/waWqbNxSQfsLvagl+YqY8a602xVKxHZ42ATyFxklmIl7 84thcCJ4zs0OP5bBgaa4Wx2kRv/vw53w6dNm6fwtfBYoD0PATh4V/GhViCaNu2/oEoC bzq90Szvvtw+t+4Y//L/i5hiMeYOuamlfl0SWSiXLi2ouVsYv+QE2M=
From: Joseph Gersch <joe.gersch@secure64.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-182--995501968"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:16:56 -0700
References: <20120217000918.22307.43753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-Id: <2D04DB88-9570-4DE3-A796-F4F07AF5EF74@secure64.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:16:59 -0000

All, 
  we have submitted a new draft that will be presented at the Paris IETF meeting.  
Please take the time to send any comments and suggestions regarding this idea on naming CIDR address blocks in the Reverse DNS.

Best regards,
   - Joe Gersch and Dan Massey


Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Date: February 16, 2012 5:09:18 PM MST
> To: joe.gersch@secure64.com
> Cc: joe.gersch@secure64.com, massey@cs.colostate.edu
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Joe Gersch and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 Reverse DNS Naming Convention for CIDR Address Blocks
> Creation date:	 2012-02-14
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 19
> 
> Abstract:
>   The current reverse DNS naming method is used to specify a complete
>   IP address.  It has not been used to handle address ranges; for
>   example, there is no formal mechanism for specifying a reverse DNS
>   name for the block of addresses specified by the IPv4 prefix
>   129.82.0.0/16.  Defining such a reverse DNS naming convention would
>   be useful for a number of applications.  These include applications
>   for secure BGP routing, and applications that need host-information
>   for a device owning a complete IPv6 address block.  This draft
>   proposes a naming convention for encoding CIDR address blocks in the
>   reverse DNS.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat

Joseph Gersch
Chief Operating Officer
Secure64 Software Corporation

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email