Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt

"Marc Lampo" <marc.lampo@eurid.eu> Mon, 20 February 2012 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.lampo@eurid.eu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C628421F8760 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:21:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWYAgkvJ48Kj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from barra.eurid.eu (barra.eurid.eu [78.41.71.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E063B21F8758 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1329744300-0369490e9c40690001-lPZdTi
Received: from zimbra.eurid.eu (zcs-master.vt.eurid.eu [10.19.100.121]) by barra.eurid.eu with ESMTP id OqKCdNDPzikplvWw; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:25:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: marc.lampo@eurid.eu
X-ASG-Whitelist: Client
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.eurid.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3FDE4075; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:21:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at techmail.eurid.eu
Received: from zimbra.eurid.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.eurid.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDUdEWqPnSKO; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:21:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zimbra.eurid.eu (zimbra.eurid.eu [10.19.100.120]) by zimbra.eurid.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057C9E4050; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:21:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Marc Lampo <marc.lampo@eurid.eu>
To: 'Joseph Gersch' <joe.gersch@secure64.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20120217000918.22307.43753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D04DB88-9570-4DE3-A796-F4F07AF5EF74@secure64.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D04DB88-9570-4DE3-A796-F4F07AF5EF74@secure64.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:21:51 +0100
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt
Message-ID: <014c01ccefd2$9aef5ad0$d0ce1070$@lampo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_014D_01CCEFDA.FCB3C2D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.14_GA_2928 (ZimbraConnectorForOutlook/5.0.3064.18)
Thread-Index: Acztl/MFN7p7ZtveSZKSucUcIXRhqACOicig
Content-Language: en-za
X-Originating-IP: [172.20.5.51]
X-Barracuda-Connect: zcs-master.vt.eurid.eu[10.19.100.121]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1329744300
X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.19.10.12:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at eurid.eu
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:21:55 -0000

Hello,



Some “typographic” remarks :

1)      5.2 IPv4 Address Block Naming à IPv6 Address Block Naming



2)      In 5.2 there are 2 examples that have missing “::”,
(2607:fa88:8000:/33 à 2607:fa88:8000::/33 and
2607:fa88:8000:/35 à 2607:fa88:8000::/35)
in 5.3 there is 1 example with missing “::”.



From: Joseph Gersch [mailto:joe.gersch@secure64.com]
Sent: 17 February 2012 06:17 PM
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt



All,

  we have submitted a new draft that will be presented at the Paris IETF
meeting.

Please take the time to send any comments and suggestions regarding this
idea on naming CIDR address blocks in the Reverse DNS.



Best regards,

   - Joe Gersch and Dan Massey





Begin forwarded message:





From: internet-drafts@ietf.org

Date: February 16, 2012 5:09:18 PM MST

To: joe.gersch@secure64.com

Cc: joe.gersch@secure64.com, massey@cs.colostate.edu

Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt



A new version of I-D, draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Joe Gersch and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:        draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr
Revision:        00
Title:               Reverse DNS Naming Convention for CIDR Address Blocks
Creation date: 2012-02-14
WG ID:                       Individual Submission
Number of pages: 19

Abstract:
  The current reverse DNS naming method is used to specify a complete
  IP address.  It has not been used to handle address ranges; for
  example, there is no formal mechanism for specifying a reverse DNS
  name for the block of addresses specified by the IPv4 prefix
  129.82.0.0/16.  Defining such a reverse DNS naming convention would
  be useful for a number of applications.  These include applications
  for secure BGP routing, and applications that need host-information
  for a device owning a complete IPv6 address block.  This draft
  proposes a naming convention for encoding CIDR address blocks in the
  reverse DNS.




The IETF Secretariat



Joseph Gersch

Chief Operating Officer

Secure64 Software Corporation