IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-bortzmeyer-dns-qname-minimisation

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 20 October 2014 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAF21ACD03 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G49wyY2HG8kA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F251ACCF8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-50-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9KJlB6T095073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-50-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.141] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141020183738.GL2323@x28.adm.denic.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:11 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80261D71-92F5-4326-BE2A-0E2D438A5E1D@vpnc.org>
References: <54336646.1040804@gmail.com> <20141020183738.GL2323@x28.adm.denic.de>
To: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tBzyfx2yJ1KeHWYV4L2_hxdVVQc
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-bortzmeyer-dns-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:47:19 -0000

On Oct 20, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Peter Koch <pk@denic.de> wrote:

>  A whole system has
> been successfully built around it with complex interdependencies.

Please say more. What are those dependencies are from a protocol point of view?

> 'parent centric' and 'child centric' resolvers and query patterns
> evolved along that algorithm.  

Please say more. Are they documented anywhere? How do they affect current operations?

> The fact that certain services may have experimented
> (successfully, to them) with the proposed algorithm already gives anecdotal
> evidence at most, but no evidence for the absence of harm.

This is the DNS: everything harms something else. We try to minimize known harm.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email