Re: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry

Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org> Fri, 23 September 2016 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alain.durand@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1458F12BDD7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zy3UNQDlOAYx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688E012BDD6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:52:23 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:52:24 -0700
From: Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>
To: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry
Thread-Index: AQHSFZQszwmM2qaOpUq35HtUo4msKKCIAvMA
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:52:23 +0000
Message-ID: <EE982383-FB56-4BB5-8FDE-FB67F64A06DD@icann.org>
References: <3CE0A36F-58C7-4FAF-B804-346E167D6AEC@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CE0A36F-58C7-4FAF-B804-346E167D6AEC@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.44.1]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_283B4BAE-B631-4904-80DD-967D2C0CAD64"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zMDVBUxObn0ipVvPxkm3eKv3E5g>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:52:28 -0000

> On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> If it seems that there is limited discussion during this two-week period and the consensus is that this is not a topic for the WG, I think that it is understandable.  Although many in DNSOP WG have expertise for this, the roster of other work represents "time better spent" means that this work could be pushed off the table.  However, the discussion ought to be resumed somewhere else.  I think that the Special Use Domain Name registry is needed but as it is currently defined, inadequate.

I  tend to agree with you. Let’s see what conclusion the chairs will draw from these 2 weeks of discussion…

Alain.