[dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04

Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 10 February 2020 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719FE1200B4; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:39:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, dnssd@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <158132395239.4159.4997095650392562087@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:39:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/Src7mmNAGGSJQ8SWUTe1L0Q-3Fk>
Subject: [dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:39:13 -0000

Reviewer: Tianran Zhou
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

In general, this document is clear to me. I did not see any special operational
or network management related issue. The problems and requirements are well
discussed in this informational document.

There are some obvious nits. For example, the number of the items in section
4.1 and 4.2.