[dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 10 February 2020 08:39 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719FE1200B4; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:39:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, dnssd@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <158132395239.4159.4997095650392562087@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:39:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/Src7mmNAGGSJQ8SWUTe1L0Q-3Fk>
Subject: [dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:39:13 -0000
Reviewer: Tianran Zhou Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. In general, this document is clear to me. I did not see any special operational or network management related issue. The problems and requirements are well discussed in this informational document. There are some obvious nits. For example, the number of the items in section 4.1 and 4.2.
- [dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dns… Tianran Zhou via Datatracker
- Re: [dnssd] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Christian Huitema