Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports
Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Fri, 06 April 2018 18:06 UTC
Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573021272E1 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWdkRUzLqQdv for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [207.136.192.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA1512D955 for <doh@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 3F48B364E6; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23239.46858.235194.288981@gro.dd.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:06:02 -0400
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqWRCCmR_6gX-u6W6qhiDfqaWh_dui_S2nTCZFcb+H1WQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <39301825-be3c-5888-ce99-45caf5ab0857@o2.pl> <f536aecc-d3e6-bd01-e869-c57a0fc9e1a8@o2.pl> <CAOdDvNqWRCCmR_6gX-u6W6qhiDfqaWh_dui_S2nTCZFcb+H1WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/OPy4ikIG2_OxHjO2ywRSfvsMObM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 18:06:08 -0000
Patrick McManus writes: > obviously, that's not always possible (such as your example) and a different > port is required.. but that's not really desirable and is already > possible so I don't think I support the change in language. I don't see why any change in language is necessary either. The Internet has a very, very long and rich history of running any given protocol on any given port the end points agree on. I don't know how anyone would reasonably conclude that the only port that DoH could possibly run on is 443, and so adding text to be explicit about it is just unnecessarily superfluous.
- [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports Patrick McManus
- Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports Mateusz Jończyk
- Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports Patrick McManus
- Re: [Doh] DOH server on non-standard ports Dave Lawrence