Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt

Steve Allam <steve.allam@trustsphere.com> Thu, 19 July 2012 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <steve.allam@trustsphere.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F18621F86AF for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.07
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.07 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.528, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tj2sOv7mUMVt for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OB2-RMV3.realmail-asp.co.uk (obgw2.realmail-asp.co.uk [80.249.107.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8E121F869C for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=trustsphere.com; s=rmdkim; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=lgTr6+WTzPVa7hH0GUnk1Fgk2v+oMfIo9yUa0n/Ecio=; b=dDprfMo0+NgKdD/4y/JY7esZqS5eIEcRcMBUiQq2EzZKNwaSCNdzd/dWk4eRBKmHs1czVGq77iNlCNpzqCXVsiC6fvb5Q5ZAMgaeSCuuAU25m9udK6gYjvUfxsLxsT09OAiTQe613Ct1Rg66mQ0daDqGxe6/GmKSJxT8OMeu1EQ=;
Received: from [116.12.149.130] (helo=cgpro.boxsentry.com) by OB2-RMV3.realmail-asp.co.uk with esmtp id 1Srnu3-000224-G9 for domainrep@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:24:15 +0100
Received: by cgpro.boxsentry.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 5.4.0) with PIPE id 2042019; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:21:53 +0800
Received: from [88.97.130.81] (account steve.allam@trustsphere.com HELO [10.1.1.35]) by cgpro.boxsentry.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPSA id 2042024 for domainrep@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:21:51 +0800
Message-ID: <5007E047.8010306@trustsphere.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:24:07 +0100
From: Steve Allam <steve.allam@trustsphere.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: domainrep@ietf.org
References: <20120628212818.23353.18943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL4OH3Q8jFss29Efzj891BO2tDL9z-OfqBudPucgamgDC3kjVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYfhpkfEYJ3q9_iJp8daDogRCNLfj9gF519C4rNYjmzjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYfhpkfEYJ3q9_iJp8daDogRCNLfj9gF519C4rNYjmzjw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090601030105020104060007"
X-LogiQ-query: 116.12.149.130/steve.allam@trustsphere.com/domainrep@ietf.org (I000 OK UNKNOWN.EXISTS )
X-RealMail-Category: UNKNOWN/UNKNOWN/
X-RealMail-Ref: UNKNOWN/str=0001.0A0B020B.5007E04F.01E2,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
X-RealMail-IWF: NO
X-CTCH-SenderID: steve.allam@trustsphere.com
X-CTCH-SenderID-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-Total-Spam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-Total-Suspected: 0
Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:23:26 -0000

Hi,

Maybe also worth pointing out that the reputation application that is 
being used (ficticious in this case) would have its own description of 
how it used the rating item, and how the number should be interpreted - 
in a similar way to many anti-spam systems that provide a score, they 
normally provide information on what different levels of that score mean 
and how you might use them - as the user, you can then do whatever you 
like, but the recommendations are provided.

As a further example, in our reputation application, the RATING item in 
the repute response will be either 0 or 1, never anything inbetween, as 
we are simply returning a true or false - our documentation will detail 
how you may wish to use the 0 or 1 as well.

Regards,

Steve



On 18/07/2012 18:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:29 AM, ??? <dgq2011@gmail.com 
> <mailto:dgq2011@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Consider this case:
>
>     Content-type: application/reputon+json
>
>     {
>
>     "reputon":
>
>     {
>
>     "rater": "RatingsRUs.example.com <http://RatingsRUs.example.com>",
>
>     "rater-authenticity": 1.0,
>
>     "assertion": "IS-GOOD",
>
>     "rated": "Alex Rodriguez",
>
>     "rating": 0.5,
>
>     "sample-size": 50000
>
>     }
>
>     }
>
>     ...indicates that we are absolutely *sure* (1.0) that the entity
>     "RatingsRUs.example.com <http://RatingsRUs.example.com>"
>     consolidated 50000 data points (perhaps from everyone in Yankee
>     Stadium) and concluded that Alex Rodriguez may be *good* or be
>     *bad* (0.5) at something. Besides, if "rater-authenticity" equals
>     0.5 but "rating" equals 1.0, it is also very hard to understand.
>
>
>
> I interpret that reply to mean, literally: RatingsRUs.example.com 
> <http://RatingsRUs.example.com> collected 50,000 data points about 
> Alex Rodriguez.  It is 100% certain that "Alex Rodriguez" refers to a 
> real thing.  The data collected indicates that the claim "Alex 
> Rodriguez is good" is 50% true.
>
> As a person reading this, I take that to mean he's not good but also 
> not bad at whatever the application space covers, or that it's 50% 
> likely that he's good.
>
> -MSK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> domainrep mailing list
> domainrep@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep