Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt

邓光青 <dgq2011@gmail.com> Wed, 18 July 2012 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dgq2011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BAD21F8692 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33iQvltGVK9c for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C5921F867A for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so1730809yen.31 for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HQr2R4cOoCGGyOcvX8oI3i9x2VgygCH6BdKHL9Ai3/o=; b=RYl4xnPxVq5c67VXTIaKU7JbpuWi2ppBAefByDxHsYb4P0ttuuW0kI5MYNuqdBGOsP 5Vhho9dioStzyL5RYKPFgLqOLRPcjaYl/tTk8NPYp5SgMzyW3nylWrIO0FHngeB8X9lT /Ew1ajTt4pEciEBCaWZ9xzEwL7b1gKEUHAC5KpjrpNWT5DzIEre62nfm2JLUAzXQmRee 4l1RK2hVa9N6MfQRB2uFWT5i2Y+IfzULV8roKIjFWOyYKL/xt5rNpRoiZz6Mav6gLyg2 gRLewuY8hvbjh8cE2bRqEsL5Uozrp5EaObl0MyoGbxdnKHwTppQa0OR95qEYikY4lqRR UfXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.42.196 with SMTP id q4mr2002723igl.28.1342618161650; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.81.168 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120628212818.23353.18943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120628212818.23353.18943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:29:21 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL4OH3Q8jFss29Efzj891BO2tDL9z-OfqBudPucgamgDC3kjVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: 邓光青 <dgq2011@gmail.com>
To: domainrep@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec5396c60981b3804c51aa6c4"
Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:28:33 -0000

Hi, folks, I have read this draft and now I am confused by the RATING
(whose definition is in section 3.1). Namely, If the RATING equals 0.5, the
ASSERTION is supported or not by the RATER? Consider this case:

Content-type: application/reputon+json

{

"reputon":

{

"rater": "RatingsRUs.example.com",

"rater-authenticity": 1.0,

"assertion": "IS-GOOD",

"rated": "Alex Rodriguez",

"rating": 0.5,

"sample-size": 50000

}

}
…indicates that we are absolutely *sure* (1.0) that the entity "
RatingsRUs.example.com" consolidated 50000 data points (perhaps from
everyone in Yankee Stadium) and concluded that Alex Rodriguez may be *good*
or be *bad* (0.5) at something. Besides, if "rater-authenticity" equals 0.5
but "rating" equals 1.0, it is also very hard to understand.

2012/6/29 <internet-drafts@ietf.org>

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the
> IETF.
>
>         Title           : A Media Type for Reputation Interchange
>         Author(s)       : Nathaniel Borenstein
>                           Murray S. Kucherawy
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt
>         Pages           : 12
>         Date            : 2012-06-28
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines a media type for exchanging reputation
>    information about an arbitrary class of object.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-media-type
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03
>
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> domainrep mailing list
> domainrep@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep
>



-- 
Guangqing Deng