Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04

<> Wed, 17 April 2019 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026C412025B; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9d1wGyC6mSdE; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951BF120148; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44kcl503hTzCrdH; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:44:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.89]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44kcl46KbCzDq7F; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:44:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM44.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:44:16 +0200
To: MeiLing Chen <>, Valery Smyslov <>, dots <>
CC: dots-chairs <>, kaduk <>
Thread-Topic: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04
Thread-Index: AQHU9P8Kg/ztZp4N9Ey5JkQsHrZyn6ZAFelw
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:44:16 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA61A7A@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <023d01d4ee1f$c2bcb190$483614b0$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA61A7AOPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:44:21 -0000

Hi Meiling,

Both draft-reddy-dots-home-network and RFC807 adopt the same approach for managing roles and connections.

That’s said, RFC8071 would be appropriate if a call home functionality was needed for the data channel.


De : Dots [] De la part de MeiLing Chen
Envoyé : mercredi 17 avril 2019 11:22
À : Valery Smyslov; dots
Cc : dots-chairs; kaduk
Objet : Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04

I have a question, does the call home in draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04 consistent with the "call home" in RFC8071?

best regards.


Research institute of China mobile communications co. LTD

Institute of safety technology

Email address:

Phone: 13810149515

Telephone: 15801696688-34283

Address: no. 32, xuanwumen west street, xicheng district, Beijing (mobile innovation building)

From: Valery Smyslov<>
Date: 2019-04-08 23:28
CC: dots-chairs<>; kaduk<>
Subject: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04
Hi all,

the chairs recently received an adoption request for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04.

This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04.
The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.

Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list before this date.
If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're willing
to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted, please explain why.

Frank & Valery.

Dots mailing list