Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18

["Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kaname,

The YANG module is correct for both attributes. I am not comfortable manually modifying the YANG tree structure. 

Regards,
-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kaname nishizuka <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:46 AM
> To: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
> 
> This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> Yes, that's true.
> Thus, "?" is required for upper-port in the subtree.
> 
> The place of "?" was wrong by my mistake in the previous message.
>            |  |     |  +--rw upper-port?    inet:port-number
> 
> please see if the automatically generated subtree is consistent with the latest
> draft.
> 
> thanks,
> Kaname
> 
> On 2018/08/28 23:19, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
> > The subtree is automatically generated from the YANG module using
> http://www.yangvalidator.com/, upper-port is optional and lower-port is
> mandatory.
> >
> >           leaf lower-port {
> >             type inet:port-number;
> >             mandatory true;
> >             description
> >               "Lower port number of the port range.";
> >           }
> >           leaf upper-port {
> >             type inet:port-number;
> >             must ". >= ../lower-port" {
> >               error-message
> >                 "The upper port number must be greater than
> >                  or equal to lower port number.";
> >             }
> >
> > -Tiru
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dots <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of kaname nishizuka
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 2:11 PM
> >> To: [e-mail]
> >> Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on
> >> draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>   From a quick review, these are tiny nits though...
> >>
> >> Figure 4: DOTS Alias Subtree
> >> <
> >>             |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number  >
> >>             |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number?
> >>
> >> Figure 8: DOTS ACLs Subtree (TCP Match) <
> >>          |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask  >
> >>          |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask?
> >>
> >> it is to indicate they are optional.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Kaname
> >>
> >> On 2018/08/22 7:03, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
> >>> The WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel ends Tuesday, August 27.
> >>> Please
> >> provide input on the mailing list by this deadline.
> >>> Roman
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Roman
> >>>> Danyliw
> >>>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 4:30 PM
> >>>> To: [e-mail]
> >>>> Subject: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello!
> >>>>
> >>>> Consistent with our discussion at the Montreal meeting, we are
> >>>> starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the DOTS Data Channel
> draft:
> >>>>
> >>>> DOTS Data Channel Specification
> >>>> draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
> >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
> >>>>
> >>>> Please send comments to the DOTS mailing list -- feedback on
> >>>> remaining issues or needed changes; as well as endorsements that
> >>>> this draft
> >> is ready.
> >>>> This WGLC will end on August 27, 2018.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Roman
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Dots mailing list
> >>>> [e-mail]
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Dots mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dots mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots