Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18

[kaname nishizuka <[e-mail]>]

Yes, that's true.
Thus, "?" is required for upper-port in the subtree.

The place of "?" was wrong by my mistake in the previous message.
           |  |     |  +--rw upper-port?    inet:port-number

please see if the automatically generated subtree is consistent with the latest draft.

thanks,
Kaname

On 2018/08/28 23:19, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
> The subtree is automatically generated from the YANG module using http://www.yangvalidator.com/, upper-port is optional and lower-port is mandatory.
>
>           leaf lower-port {
>             type inet:port-number;
>             mandatory true;
>             description
>               "Lower port number of the port range.";
>           }
>           leaf upper-port {
>             type inet:port-number;
>             must ". >= ../lower-port" {
>               error-message
>                 "The upper port number must be greater than
>                  or equal to lower port number.";
>             }
>
> -Tiru
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dots <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of kaname nishizuka
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 2:11 PM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   From a quick review, these are tiny nits though...
>>
>> Figure 4: DOTS Alias Subtree
>> <
>>             |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number  >
>>             |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number?
>>
>> Figure 8: DOTS ACLs Subtree (TCP Match)
>> <
>>          |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask  >
>>          |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask?
>>
>> it is to indicate they are optional.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kaname
>>
>> On 2018/08/22 7:03, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> The WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel ends Tuesday, August 27.  Please
>> provide input on the mailing list by this deadline.
>>> Roman
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 4:30 PM
>>>> To: [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Consistent with our discussion at the Montreal meeting, we are
>>>> starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the DOTS Data Channel draft:
>>>>
>>>> DOTS Data Channel Specification
>>>> draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>
>>>> Please send comments to the DOTS mailing list -- feedback on
>>>> remaining issues or needed changes; as well as endorsements that this draft
>> is ready.
>>>> This WGLC will end on August 27, 2018.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dots mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dots mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dots mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots