[dtn-interest] Re: [IRSG] POLL: draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07 -- DUE JAN 9

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

The DTN architecture document has been updated [1] as a
result of the recent IRSG poll comments.

Can the people who commented on this please check that the
new version resolves their comments, say before Jan 9th?
(That's the set of folks on the To: list of this message.)

Having done a quick check, the highlights of the diffs [2] vs.
the comments that I believe are holding the document are:

- Michael Welzl had concerns about reporting - those features
are now called out as optional and its explained how they are
for diagnostic purposes (I note in passing that they were
found to be useful for this during the interop in San Diego!)

- Thomas Henderson had some problems with the EID term (and
terminology in general). There were some editorial changes
made, and it was pointed out that there is a terminology
section in the bundle specification draft [3], (which will
be starting its poll real soon now, btw).

Let me know if there're others that I missed (I believe Mark
Allman's non-overlapping comments were not "holding" ones,
since he said that himself:-)

Thanks,
Stephen.


[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-08.txt
[2] 
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07.txt
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec-08.txt