IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 18 March 2016 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0B312D571 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Go7DAqS6U9EJ for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E29712DABE for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DC0BE58; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WVYAPiAWvWGj; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41D9BBE50; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1458319086; bh=Ym5u9bUpOYpUMbw50TeLVjpRzUrbaAKE+7YwOvj5rm4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=qVe9gP6WrwC88avF8X3QVvAxRk1h2H6eXNiYB8OnQN91e8gYrye+6IzjI5xxMpm9l olI7IW2HxKgPcWGyFY8LaJrGE/nKVl3A4IfZ1I1C1yEbXOicg29WGUwVBZt5RGli4u Y0mWTsj/uxMnLBRosEvVfcjXupEYhS+NyzQWbkK0=
To: Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi>, "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
References: <D3119D3F.40ABF%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> <56EC2E6E.9050309@netlab.tkk.fi>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56EC2EED.80905@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:38:05 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56EC2E6E.9050309@netlab.tkk.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms060800040004060204090905"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/c4aKw5E26m2w8H1KOiqtG77AfrM>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:38:09 -0000


On 18/03/16 16:35, Joerg Ott wrote:
> 
> As we discussed among the chairs and Lars, we should not hang in a limbo
> state but rather be (1) or not be (0).  At present, my sense is more on
> the 0 side; we also see on the research side that the activity level in
> this field has gone down.
> 
> I believe that the concepts (and notions of protocol robustness)
> discussed in the field (irrespective of the bundle protocol) remain
> valid and useful also the Internet at large.  So, we have done our
> share and we spawned a working group.  Time to take a break, declare
> success, and go home.  As Will put it, perhaps something to return
> to in the future.  We'll see.

I agree with Joerg.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email