IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?

Kevin Fall <kfall@kfall.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kfall@kfall.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C318B12D5CD for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kfall-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkIKQNeGy343 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C44A12D526 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r187so138252085oih.3 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kfall-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=vyBnbQNy+kVlWFkpECn1lrqpXeRoyDgkgOVNV3AINfY=; b=PcWpg9vm9s9eSnp2goz4WJfEailgskNNA67c+UMWgDpIZ7itHfnSDKrKplYdMCqMQO 6ndtUNxS0csEZ+qI1bG33wJ2N+S9Fcx8TO7lhciNvE0Hs7akYTEuT27LN6d/tH/dCL/b +Q7+J7wSqGSnDL8G0tp5p/18Sgz/IMWrkPLKh6s3nhrRItB7f4GCdNP9fmJJdeYY5FMq H8va3yfe/A5sQlmJ86xsO1U6aHML1JbDj02slpwqfDBAQN6/LKn+7Mok6ySsWl7lZ0vs 22++E9QdvnapVU0hnGz/NN49LknpLhJrsUv0BXjDMBfVyMy93lBiRKfVulOY2okEuSCE /qBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=vyBnbQNy+kVlWFkpECn1lrqpXeRoyDgkgOVNV3AINfY=; b=Y6/8YhNy0FuJib9fJEluOVcjY39uN1UGDytRIPJqc8loa29+NBbkwGjKoPtK3KHJSK EjgnEdYIXgRgSuUd8Vr1ABOyWkwevDii6IHiI57Z/0pY74iesjU3YYTpPug6yWPZRJfW 100EEZ20uGozABC34EhOZynN9VMXVj9hLa3mazJTcXiNUp/vPfedW5csSb1xQWM4syyz KHa8KpvQn7LXJZNbkKvSGx3xomZL313m6sAG5ZoywCk+KiZyzCY/HEH2lcKBcB4jBN9k ODf6qWrQ7QEspfQ6xgqixVIlGVMzwbsg9nwicNsqezZ46XuB9wdhKC3lJbeVhmmzJMyT UpHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKPJjMGgwruQtafR3Itxh6+EaV+cZjv67O3eApwrWdMPFppj1iFa7D1SULA5j+9iYvj+E9RWDLT5/QE8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.157.59.230 with SMTP id k93mr827370otc.167.1458563617927; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.222.84 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.106.197.60]
In-Reply-To: <56EC2EED.80905@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <D3119D3F.40ABF%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> <56EC2E6E.9050309@netlab.tkk.fi> <56EC2EED.80905@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:33:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CALhyZY8TKOVN_bWpYsgc-twJVx1rp+7YeGF+z04-wCQXoi_OCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Fall <kfall@kfall.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11493a8e545393052e8e4e95"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/yUKXux9PkREoqIvE4kODUx4_8dk>
Cc: "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:33:41 -0000

I'd say that although there are a couple of items that cold be pursued,
there doesn't appear to be the commitment at this time to do so.  Not
completely surprising given the presence of the WG now.  By way of upshot,
I'm ok to move to close it.   Thanks to all who have contributed over the
years, its been a pleasure.  FWIW, I think it would be useful to keep the
email list around if we are allowed to do so.

regards,
- Kevin



On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
> wrote:

>
>
> On 18/03/16 16:35, Joerg Ott wrote:
> >
> > As we discussed among the chairs and Lars, we should not hang in a limbo
> > state but rather be (1) or not be (0).  At present, my sense is more on
> > the 0 side; we also see on the research side that the activity level in
> > this field has gone down.
> >
> > I believe that the concepts (and notions of protocol robustness)
> > discussed in the field (irrespective of the bundle protocol) remain
> > valid and useful also the Internet at large.  So, we have done our
> > share and we spawned a working group.  Time to take a break, declare
> > success, and go home.  As Will put it, perhaps something to return
> > to in the future.  We'll see.
>
> I agree with Joerg.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email