Re: [e2md] Doodle poll: Next Conf-Call on Requirements

[Bernie Hoeneisen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lawrence

On Tue, 18 May 2010, Lawrence Conroy wrote:

> Hi Bernie,  folks,
> I am slightly confused. The Dean & Rich show does that :)p
>
> This looks rather like a Bait 'n' Switch deal.

I face difficulties to see the connection between your email the one you 
replied to. Your email appears to be a reply to an administrative email 
containing a doodle poll request. Was your reply really meant as a 
followup to the doodle poll request or which email was meant?


> First Step:
> I'd guess that revival could work on Send-N and Unused.
> [Assuming we can roll back some of the more arcane restrictions
> in section 1.2 of rfc3761bis and the bit moved into the second
> paragraph of the intro of section 2].

[Moved to ENUM as it is about 3761bis.]

> -----
>
> SO ... what is the other stuff that you are asking for requirements,
> and some seem to be thinking of other RR types, use of other protocols,
> indirection, ... ?
>
> It sure isn't ENUM. I seem to have lost track. Clarification required.

In the upcoming conference call (as decided in the previous call), we 
intend to discuss the requirements. The goal is to find a common 
understanding of the requirements and uses cases. I wish we could even 
walk out of the call with a subset of requirements and use cases that has 
high chances to lead to an agreed charter soon. Though, timing might be
in the way of my wishes...

Or was your question not related to the upcoming conference call, but 
rather to some other email/topic?

cheers,
  Bernie