Re: [e2md] [Enum] E2MD and Indirection -- a new problem statement
Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com> Sat, 15 May 2010 11:31 UTC
Return-Path: <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B733A6A39; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.905, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJ0y-tzq7DUG; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E683A67DB; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.28] ([unknown] [173.71.223.14]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L2G003C4LCINP30@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net>; Sat, 15 May 2010 06:31:33 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <4BEE8612.1050907@netmagic.com>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 07:31:30 -0400
From: Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
Organization: Netmagic Associates
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100406 Shredder/3.0.4
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
References: <4BED7940.20405@softarmor.com> <00aa01caf38b$89ffd910$9dff8b30$@us> <4BEE3123.80509@softarmor.com>
In-reply-to: <4BEE3123.80509@softarmor.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'IETF ENUM list' <enum@ietf.org>, "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" <e2md@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [e2md] [Enum] E2MD and Indirection -- a new problem statement
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: trutkowski@netmagic.com
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:31:45 -0000
On 5/15/2010 1:29 AM, Dean Willis wrote: > Either solve the problem in a way that is acceptable to "the DNS people" > by using the DNS consistently with their guidelines, or move the > problem outside the DNS. Trying to shove it down their throats is just > going to perpetuate further non-progress. > > Well said. The OID Resolution Sytem (ORS) folks ran into the same pushback from the "DNS people," even when a similar instantiation occurred with ONS. --tony
- [e2md] E2MD and Indirection -- a new problem stat… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] E2MD and Indirection -- a new problem … Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] E2MD and Indirection -- a new problem … Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] [Enum] E2MD and Indirection -- a new p… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] [Enum] E2MD and Indirection -- a new p… bmanning