IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the Problem statement needed

Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at> Sat, 15 May 2010 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lendl@cert.at>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9223A6842 for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.800, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-yDKrWqpRZL for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nuwen.cert.at (nuwen.cert.at [83.136.33.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7613A62C1 for <e2md@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meta.lan (meta.intern.cert.at [172.21.48.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nuwen.cert.at (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C575810073; Sat, 15 May 2010 22:33:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lendl by meta.lan with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <lendl@cert.at>) id 1ODO2l-0004fv-Ka; Sat, 15 May 2010 22:33:07 +0200
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 22:33:07 +0200
From: Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Message-ID: <20100515203307.GB17608@nic.at>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005131459070.24552@softronics.hoeneisen.ch> <002f01caf2ac$f69161a0$e3b424e0$@us> <4BED5842.4020101@nic.at> <00a901caf388$fe6eda60$fb4c8f20$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00a901caf388$fe6eda60$fb4c8f20$@us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
X-CERTat-MailScanner-ID: C575810073.2F631
X-CERTat-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-CERTat-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-CERTat-MailScanner-From: lendl@cert.at
Cc: "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" <e2md@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the Problem statement needed
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 06:57:03 -0000

On 2010/05/14 19:05, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> wrote:
> Oh certainly all of the below are essential attributes of a successful e2MD
> system.

Which contradicts your

> > Non URI data in ENUM. What about that doesn't people understand?

statement.

Plain DNS and thus ENUM do not provide these extended query features,
and if you need need them in E2MD, then E2MD is not just ENUM with
non-uri data.

You can't have it both ways.

otmar

> 
> Ok. Can I take it as a given that you don't need E2MD to support
> 
> * different answers based on who's asking
> * different answers based on source-URI
> * different answers based on some kind of trunk (or SIP-peer) information
> 
> ?
> 

-- 
// Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>, T: +43 1 5056416 - 33, F: - 933
// nic.at Internet Verwaltungs- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H
// http://www.nic.at/  LG Salzburg, FN 172568b, Sitz: Salzburg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email