Re: [e2md] [Enum] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem statement
Christian Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> Fri, 14 May 2010 12:50 UTC
Return-Path: <cdel@firsthand.net>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE8C3A6AA7; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Yn0oWFP21lh; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outmail28.go.net.mt (outmail50.go.net.mt [80.93.157.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AC03A6971; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.1.72] (helo=fender72.go.net.mt) by outmail28.go.net.mt with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <cdel@firsthand.net>) id 1OCuLS-000752-4a; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:50:26 +0200
Received: from [195.158.93.136] (helo=[192.168.3.5]) by fender72.go.net.mt with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <cdel@firsthand.net>) id 1OCuLR-0007JW-UM; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:50:26 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Christian Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
In-Reply-To: <00e501caf303$9b166cb0$d1434610$@us>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:50:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B8653835-FD2B-4E57-B8F9-9E115B40C8CE@firsthand.net>
References: <4BEC7EDF.7000908@softarmor.com> <C8125A26.56A0%ray.bellis@nominet.org.uk> <00e501caf303$9b166cb0$d1434610$@us>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2010 06:18:59 -0700
Cc: 'IETF ENUM list' <enum@ietf.org>, "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" <e2md@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [e2md] [Enum] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem statement
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:50:46 -0000
I don't believe IETF should be afraid if others decide to take IETF stuff and do their own take with it. That is not a good reason to do those carbuncle things In IETF. What is a good reason is if the WG is taking the initiative and doing work that is for everyone, scales and isn't just trying to satisfy a need in some walled garden. So what would be the workplan? Apologies if I've missed a draft that explains this. In which case I would be grateful for a pointer. Christian On 14 May 2010, at 03:20, Richard Shockey wrote: > So ... all in favor of re chartering the ENUM WG ..please hum on this list > or the ENUM WG list now attached. > > Its time to force the issue. This is important work ultimately central to > making SIP work better. Stall and delay is not a rational option here. SIP > Service providers and IMS providers want clarity and direction on where the > technical standards are moving, if at all. If the IETF doesn't do this it > will be done privately and without proper community and peer review. > > -----Original Message----- > From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray > Bellis > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:39 PM > To: Dean Willis > Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list > Subject: Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem statement > > >> Are the rest of the sentences true and consistent with the work we've > proposed >> to do? > > They're consistent with the approach in Bernie's draft. > > However on the last call the it was proposed that it might be a good > idea to simply reboot the ENUM WG. In another message Richard has shown > that much (if not all) of what we want to do is _already_ within charter. > > [[[ > I first proposed E2M during the Dublin IETF, as a way to mitigate concerns > that a particular ex-AD had over use of E2U for "non-communications data". > AFAICR he was OK with this proposal, which then laid dormant until Bernie > wrote it up. > > For my own Send-N draft, my plan had actually been to simply wait for the > ENUM Services Guide draft to become an RFC, and the re-file under the expert > review process. > ]]] > > Ray > > _______________________________________________ > e2md mailing list > e2md@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Otmar Lendl
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Dean Willis
- [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the Probl… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Ray Bellis
- [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem … Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Jim Reid
- [e2md] Rechartering the ENUM WG Jim Reid
- Re: [e2md] [Enum] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of t… Christian Larrinaga
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Prob… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Otmar Lendl
- Re: [e2md] Action Required: Your version of the P… Lawrence Conroy
- [e2md] Stupid DNS tricks Jim Reid
- Re: [e2md] Stupid DNS tricks Victor Pascual Avila
- Re: [e2md] Stupid DNS tricks Jim Reid
- Re: [e2md] Stupid DNS tricks Lawrence Conroy