Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 19 April 2006 07:31 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW79u-0001YT-Nr; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:31:30 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW79t-0001YO-3z for ecrit@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:31:29 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20] helo=mail.gmx.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW79q-0003uU-Lj for ecrit@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:31:29 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2006 07:31:24 -0000
Received: from p54985A15.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.33]) [84.152.90.21] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 09:31:24 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
Message-ID: <4445E74D.8010907@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:31:25 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20060418224723.02988ec8@email.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20060418224723.02988ec8@email.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b5d20af10c334b36874c0264b10f59f1
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

Hi James,

James M. Polk wrote:
> Hannes
> 
> Brian and I are working on the last item listed, so we know we can 
> finish that one.

When do you realistically expect such a document to be finished? Since 
it is a BCP I don't expect to get it done soon. Maybe March 2007 could 
be realistic? It certainly has to be some time after the mapping 
protocol and the location conveyance draft.

Ciao
Hannes

> 
> I know the design team will churn out an Arch ID, so that one can be 
> finished.
> 
> I have no input, other than review and comments, into Hennings LUMP Arch 
> ID.
> 
> 
> At 09:29 PM 4/18/2006 +0200, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> at the last ECRIT WG meeting we had a discussion about rechartering. 
>> Jon  indicated that it might be a good time to start a discussion 
>> about the text. Here is a first attempt:
>>
>> -------------
>>
>> March 2006              Informational RFC containing terminology
>> definitions and the requirements
>>
>> (Draft: "Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution with Internet 
>> Technologies"; draft-ietf-ecrit-requirements-*)
>>
>> May 2006                An Informational document describing the threats
>> and security considerations
>>
>> (Example document: "Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency 
>> Call Marking and Mapping"; draft-taylor-ecrit-security-threats-*)
>>
>> March 2006              A Standards Track RFC describing how to identify
>> a session set-up request is to an emergency response center
>>
>> (Draft: "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Services"; 
>> draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-*)
>>
>> Nov 2006                A Standards Track RFC describing how to route an
>> emergency call based on location information
>>
>> (Example document: "LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol"; 
>> draft-hardie-ecrit-lost-*)
>>
>> TBD TBD           An Informational document describing the Mapping 
>> Protocol Architecture
>>
>> (Example document: "Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework";
>> draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-mapping-arch-*)
>>
>> TBD TBD           An Informational document describing the ECRIT 
>> Architecture
>>
>> (Example documents are draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-arch-02.txt 
>> and draft-polk-newton-ecrit-arch-considerations-02.txt)
>>
>> TBD TBD           A BCP RFC describing the emergency call support for 
>> devices.
>>
>> (Example document: "Best Current Practice for Communications Services 
>> in support of Emergency Calling"; draft-rosen-ecrit-phonebcp-*)
>>
>> -------------
>>
>> Please note that the milestone date is missing for the last 3 items. I 
>> would like to solicit input from the group: When can we finish these 
>> documents?
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ecrit mailing list
>> Ecrit@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit