RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
"McCalmont, Patti" <Patti.McCalmont@intrado.com> Wed, 19 April 2006 14:06 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWDKc-0006xZ-Vp; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:06:58 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWDKb-0006wJ-HD for ecrit@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:06:57 -0400
Received: from fwc-3a.sccx.com ([199.117.205.18]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWDKa-0005Gu-3s for ecrit@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:06:57 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:06:49 -0500
Message-ID: <422D410BD61FC04185076AD99AA7207A0183A152@inilmx01.lgmt.trdo>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
Thread-Index: AcZjHoDHs0ywPyz2ToyZkOt5wehbuwAmhpYQ
From: "McCalmont, Patti" <Patti.McCalmont@intrado.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, ecrit@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Apr 2006 14:06:51.0230 (UTC) FILETIME=[8160A7E0:01C663BA]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Hannes, On the item listed below, how do you think this will relate to work going in other organizations such as 3GPP(already have a draft started), ESIF, PTSC and others? Is it really an architecture document since IETF's focus is on defining protocols? Should this really be an item addressed here? The other SDOs are looking at using protocols defined within ECRIT but working out the architectures of how they fit into their own networks. Guess I'm wondering if this item should really be part of this charter. Patti >TBD TBD An Informational document describing the ECRIT >Architecture >(Example documents are draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-arch-02.txt >and draft-polk-newton-ecrit-arch-considerations-02.txt) Please note that the milestone date is missing for the last 3 items. I would like to solicit input from the group: When can we finish these documents? Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)