RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
"McCalmont, Patti" <Patti.McCalmont@intrado.com> Thu, 20 April 2006 19:14 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWebv-0000Oa-1e; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:14:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWebt-0000OV-Fm for ecrit@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:14:37 -0400
Received: from [209.108.197.38] (helo=fwc-3a.sccx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWebt-0000gL-1A for ecrit@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:14:37 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <422D410BD61FC04185076AD99AA7207A0183A480@inilmx01.lgmt.trdo>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion
Thread-Index: AcZkrb74nkBrJenXTgKakQt3Iw+szwAAMChg
From: "McCalmont, Patti" <Patti.McCalmont@intrado.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2006 19:14:32.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7C524C0:01C664AE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b2809b6f39decc6de467dcf252f42af1
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ecrit.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Actually, I prefer what Hannes suggested - ECRIT Framework. Are you OK with that? Patti -----Original Message----- From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:07 PM To: McCalmont, Patti Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes; ecrit@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion Patti This ECRIT Architecture document is the IETF's take on how we developed the LoST protocol, Emergency Call Identification and the PhoneBCP - under what conditions, what we looked at, what we discounted and why, etc. That is not the job of NENA or ESIF or ETSI or PacketCable. Of course each of those SDOs can do their take on emergency calling too. But for anyone just looking at the IETF, to figure out what this WG was thinking, this concept needs to be captured in an overarching document. I prefer a doc title of "ECRIT Architecture" to what you have below. At 08:34 AM 4/20/2006 -0500, McCalmont, Patti wrote: >Then perhaps the charter task should be - ECRIT protocol Interaction and >Consideration document. IMO, architecture means a lot more. > >Patti > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tschofenig, Hannes [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com] >Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:54 AM >To: McCalmont, Patti; Hannes Tschofenig; ecrit@ietf.org >Subject: AW: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion > >Hi Patti, > >the document that is going to be produced by the design team should >provide information about the interation between the different >protocols/extensions we are developing and reusing (e.g., Geopriv and >SIP stuff). > >For example, draft-polk-newton-ecrit-arch-considerations-02.txt already >describes the different steps that might need to be executed. We >essentially describe these steps in more detail. > >Another example can be found in the protocol interactions we discussed >at the ECRIT session at IETF#65 as part of Henning's presentation: >(slide 3 - slide 5) >http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/ecrit-3/sld1.htm > >A document with such a content is, in my view, an 'architecture' >document. We could also call it 'framework' if this is a less overloaded >term. > >Although the details of the document are for further study we are >basically going to capture what we discussed during the last year (plus >a number of new things that will come up with the ongoing work). There >is currently no document that describes the big picture. Several >working group members repeately asked for such a document and hence we >are going to work on it. I think it is a very reasonable to capture >these discussions and we have support from our AD todo it. > >Ciao >Hannes > >PS: The design team might also want to take a look at the work done by >the 3GPP and other organizations, for example. > > > Hi Hannes, > > > > On the item listed below, how do you think this will relate to work > > going in other organizations such as 3GPP(already have a > > draft started), > > ESIF, PTSC and others? Is it really an architecture document since > > IETF's focus is on defining protocols? Should this really be an item > > addressed here? The other SDOs are looking at using protocols defined > > within ECRIT but working out the architectures of how they fit into > > their own networks. > > > > Guess I'm wondering if this item should really be part of > > this charter. > > > > Patti > > > > > > >TBD TBD An Informational document describing the ECRIT > > >Architecture > > > > >(Example documents are > > draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-arch-02.txt > > >and draft-polk-newton-ecrit-arch-considerations-02.txt) > > > > > > > > Please note that the milestone date is missing for the last 3 > > items. I > > would like to solicit input from the group: When can we finish these > > documents? > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ecrit mailing list > > Ecrit@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ecrit mailing list > > Ecrit@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ecrit mailing list >Ecrit@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- Re: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion James M. Polk
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion McCalmont, Patti
- RE: [Ecrit] Rechartering Discussion GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)