Re: [Ecrit] New work in ECRIT

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

At 08:19 AM 8/3/2010, Marc Linsner wrote:
>During the meeting last week the following drafts were discussed in the
>context of accepting them as WG items.
>
>draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
>draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
>draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
>draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
>draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea

Of the 5 items above, each have their advocates and uses (some more 
than others). That said, I believe the data-only-ea is imperative and 
am willing to work on it any way I can.

I believe we can't avoid doing the psap-callback item, as there are 
too many organizations that want something from us on this topic - or 
they will each do it their own way. If we can provide a basis or a 
complete solution for others to use, we should do this too.

James


>The chairs and ADs have reviewed the level of interest in these, compared
>the work to the current charter and believe these fit within the scope of
>ECRIT.
>
>We asked during the meeting if anyone objects to accepting any or all of
>these drafts as WG items.  So, now, we're asking on the list.
>
>If you object to any of these drafts becoming WG items, please explain if
>you think the work is something ECRIT should not do, or if you simply have
>problems with current version of the particular draft.  No response is a
>show of support for all of this work.
>
>Once the above question is answered, the chairs will devise a work plan to
>finish the accepted work.
>
>Also discussed in the meeting was the priority order of getting these drafts
>completed, and it was the general feeling that psap-callback,
>unauthenticated-access, and trustworthy-location were the most difficult and
>would take more time.  Of those three the general feeling was the
>psap-callback was the highest priority.  If you have an opinion on which
>draft should completed first, please send it to the list.
>
>Please respond by COB on Wednesday, 8/11/2010 if you have objections to any
>of this work, or you have strong feelings on the priority of the work.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Marc, Richard, Roger-
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit