Re: [Ecrit] New work in ECRIT

Hi Marc, 

I believe all of them are important but their timeline is quite
different. 

I expect the draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data to be finished first
since it builds on top of existing work from NENA. What is missing at
the moment is the security and privacy writeup. 

draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea is also a fairly easy document and it
again builds on top of the NENA i3 work. What is left is to align the
approach of dealing with location with the NENA i3 specification (or at
least check whether they say the same). 

draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location does not require a protocol
definition; instead the challenge is to present the problem in a clear
way and to come to an agreement of the suggestions. I believe that this
will take a bit more time. 

Then, there are 2 hard problems: draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback,
and draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access (whereby the latter
is even harder, I believe). From a milestone point of view I would put
them last. draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access is quite
useful and overlaps a bit with ECRIT Direct (i.e. the draft that
provides a writeup about the case where there is no VSP/ASP in the
signaling exchange). 

Ciao
Hannes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of ext Marc Linsner
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 4:20 PM
> To: 'ecrit'
> Subject: [Ecrit] New work in ECRIT
> 
> During the meeting last week the following drafts were 
> discussed in the
> context of accepting them as WG items.
> 
> draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
> draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
> draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
> draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
> draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea
> 
> The chairs and ADs have reviewed the level of interest in 
> these, compared
> the work to the current charter and believe these fit within 
> the scope of
> ECRIT.
> 
> We asked during the meeting if anyone objects to accepting 
> any or all of
> these drafts as WG items.  So, now, we're asking on the list.
> 
> If you object to any of these drafts becoming WG items, 
> please explain if
> you think the work is something ECRIT should not do, or if 
> you simply have
> problems with current version of the particular draft.  No 
> response is a
> show of support for all of this work.
> 
> Once the above question is answered, the chairs will devise a 
> work plan to
> finish the accepted work.
> 
> Also discussed in the meeting was the priority order of 
> getting these drafts
> completed, and it was the general feeling that psap-callback,
> unauthenticated-access, and trustworthy-location were the 
> most difficult and
> would take more time.  Of those three the general feeling was the
> psap-callback was the highest priority.  If you have an 
> opinion on which
> draft should completed first, please send it to the list.
> 
> Please respond by COB on Wednesday, 8/11/2010 if you have 
> objections to any
> of this work, or you have strong feelings on the priority of the work.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Marc, Richard, Roger-
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 