Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

At 11:29 AM 3/16/2010, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC525.E3BAA375"
>
>--- I let the new chairs figure out how to arrange the items 
>properly but since I had written the mail already find my response below.
>
>Let us take a look at the list of WG items we have:
>
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-14.txt>Best 
>Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency 
>Calling (107967 bytes)
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-10.txt>Framework 
>for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia (96432 bytes)
>
>  --> Brian says he does not need time for the two items above.
>
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-04.txt>Location 
>Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements (20127 bytes)
>
>  --> This document does not seem to require time. At least from the 
> IESG review feedback I have not seen anything dramatic.
>
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-specifying-holes-02.txt>Specifying 
>Holes in LoST Service Boundaries (22007 bytes)
>
>There were a punch of review comments but Martin did not send us a 
>request for a presentation. I assume that he feels comfortable 
>addressing the comments. Is this correct, Martin?
>
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-09.txt>Synchronizing 
>Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol based Service 
>Boundaries and Mapping Elements (50425 bytes)
>
>The comments on the list by Alex got addressed and I shipped a new 
>version. I don't believe it would make sense to discuss the comment again.
>
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-04.txt>IANA 
>Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local 
>Emergency Communications (19327 bytes)
>
>Marc is responsible for this work and I have not received a request 
>for a presentation slot.

BTW - I have revved this doc, specifically addressing/incorporating 
each of the comments/suggested modifications by Keith Drage.

I'll announce this in a separate message to the list. I don't believe 
there needs to be valuable preso time given to this ID, as I believe 
I have addressed every concern/comment/question that I have received 
- and am just waiting on it being chartered (with a milestone) to pub 
request the ID. In other words, I think this doc is done and ready 
for IESG review.

James


><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03.txt>LoST 
>Service List Boundary Extension (26226 bytes)
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc-01.txt>Using 
>Imprecise Location for Emergency Context Resolution (39455 bytes)
>
>My understanding of the two documents from above is that they are 
>essentially done; we are only waiting for the feedback from the APPS 
>directorate on the Relax NG schema.
>
>Ciao
>Hannes
>
>Brian Rosen wrote:
>I don't see any issues with -phonebcp and -framework that would need 
>meeting time.
>Brian
>
>On 3/12/10 6:09 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>This is a lot of things to fit in 2.5 hours. It's possible that if I 
>saw how much time each had it would all look find but I'm very 
>worried about just starting new work and not finishing things. I 
>want to be sure there is no time required for any of the current WG items.
>Cullen
>
>On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>ECRIT Meeting Agenda (Version 3) ================================
>MONDAY, March 22, 2010 0900-1130 Morning Session I Room: Palos Verdes
>* Agenda Bashing and Status Update (Marc, Hannes, Roger)
>* PSAP Callback (TBD) 
><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki 
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
>
>Intention: Discuss potential feedback from emergency services groups 
>on the requirements for this work.
>* Unauthenticated emergency services (Dirk) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
>
>Intention: Determine next steps. The group wants to work on it but 
>there are still lots of open issues and re-chartering is required to 
>add it to the milestone list. * Transformations ID (James P.) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn 
>Intention: TBD.
>* ECRIT Direct (James W.) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct
>
>Intention: TBD. * Additional Data (Brian) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
>
>Intention: Initial document version. Presentation of the history and 
>the origin of the work. Determine interest.
>* Data Only Emergency Calls (Brian) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea
>
>Intention: TBD.
>* Completing the Request Location (Brian) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt
>
>Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this 
>document. The document is making a normative change to RFC 5222.
>* Service URN Update and Service Classification (Henning) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification 
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy 
>Intention: Documents are a bit stuck although group agreed to work 
>on it. Henning will present a way forward. * Emergency Text 
>Messaging using SIP MESSAGE (Henning) 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt
>
>Intention: Discussion about what the group should do in this area.
>* Describing Boundaries for Civic Addresse 
><http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt
>
>Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this doc. 
>_______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list 
>[e-mail] 
><https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit 
>
>
>Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: 
><http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list 
>[e-mail] 
><https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit 
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit