Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Tue, 16 March 2010 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11403A6C17 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1Xh5PQscuts for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4403A6A69 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2GGe8NS027190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:08 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2GGe8IV032275; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:08 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:07 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC527.56228FE9"
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:39:37 +0200
Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBBE@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601A@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
Thread-Index: AcrFJdI4HP6iOQKoTyiPsVP3yH77fwAARI5AAAAMs3A=
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBA6@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601A@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: "ext Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>, br@brianrosen.net, fluffy@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2010 16:40:07.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[565D9350:01CAC527]
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:41:32 -0000
This mail was just in response to Cullen's note about the existing work items. So, I went through the list to explain that they are doing fine. The previous agenda has not changed and Marc & Richard need to figure out how to arrange the time. Ciao Hannes ________________________________ From: ext Winterbottom, James [mailto:James.Winterbottom@andrew.com] Sent: 16 March, 2010 12:38 To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); br@brianrosen.net; fluffy@cisco.com Cc: ecrit@ietf.org Subject: RE: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Does this mean that none of the "intention" documents listed in the previous agendas have made the cut? Cheers James ________________________________ From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2010 3:29 AM To: br@brianrosen.net; fluffy@cisco.com Cc: ecrit@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 --- I let the new chairs figure out how to arrange the items properly but since I had written the mail already find my response below. Let us take a look at the list of WG items we have: Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency Calling <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-14.txt> (107967 bytes) Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-10.txt> (96432 bytes) --> Brian says he does not need time for the two items above. Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-04.txt> (20127 bytes) --> This document does not seem to require time. At least from the IESG review feedback I have not seen anything dramatic. Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-specifying-holes-02.txt> (22007 bytes) There were a punch of review comments but Martin did not send us a request for a presentation. I assume that he feels comfortable addressing the comments. Is this correct, Martin? Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-09.txt> (50425 bytes) The comments on the list by Alex got addressed and I shipped a new version. I don't believe it would make sense to discuss the comment again. IANA Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-0 4.txt> (19327 bytes) Marc is responsible for this work and I have not received a request for a presentation slot. LoST Service List Boundary Extension <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03.txt > (26226 bytes) Using Imprecise Location for Emergency Context Resolution <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc-01.txt> (39455 bytes) My understanding of the two documents from above is that they are essentially done; we are only waiting for the feedback from the APPS directorate on the Relax NG schema. Ciao Hannes Brian Rosen wrote: I don't see any issues with -phonebcp and -framework that would need meeting time. Brian On 3/12/10 6:09 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: This is a lot of things to fit in 2.5 hours. It's possible that if I saw how much time each had it would all look find but I'm very worried about just starting new work and not finishing things. I want to be sure there is no time required for any of the current WG items. Cullen On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: ECRIT Meeting Agenda (Version 3) ================================ MONDAY, March 22, 2010 0900-1130 Morning Session I Room: Palos Verdes * Agenda Bashing and Status Update (Marc, Hannes, Roger) * PSAP Callback (TBD) http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback> Intention: Discuss potential feedback from emergency services groups on the requirements for this work. * Unauthenticated emergency services (Dirk) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access > Intention: Determine next steps. The group wants to work on it but there are still lots of open issues and re-chartering is required to add it to the milestone list. * Transformations ID (James P.) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn> Intention: TBD. * ECRIT Direct (James W.) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct> Intention: TBD. * Additional Data (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data> Intention: Initial document version. Presentation of the history and the origin of the work. Determine interest. * Data Only Emergency Calls (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea> Intention: TBD. * Completing the Request Location (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt> Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this document. The document is making a normative change to RFC 5222. * Service URN Update and Service Classification (Henning) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy> Intention: Documents are a bit stuck although group agreed to work on it. Henning will present a way forward. * Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE (Henning) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt> Intention: Discussion about what the group should do in this area. * Describing Boundaries for Civic Addresse http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt> Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this doc. _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit> Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html <http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>
- [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Cullen Jennings