Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3

"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Tue, 16 March 2010 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11403A6C17 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1Xh5PQscuts for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4403A6A69 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2GGe8NS027190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:08 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2GGe8IV032275; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:08 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:07 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC527.56228FE9"
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:39:37 +0200
Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBBE@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601A@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
Thread-Index: AcrFJdI4HP6iOQKoTyiPsVP3yH77fwAARI5AAAAMs3A=
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBA6@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601A@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: "ext Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>, br@brianrosen.net, fluffy@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2010 16:40:07.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[565D9350:01CAC527]
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:41:32 -0000

This mail was just in response to Cullen's note about the existing work
items. So, I went through the list to explain that they are doing fine. 
 
The previous agenda has not changed and Marc & Richard need to figure
out how to arrange the time. 
 
Ciao
Hannes


________________________________

	From: ext Winterbottom, James
[mailto:James.Winterbottom@andrew.com] 
	Sent: 16 March, 2010 12:38
	To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); br@brianrosen.net;
fluffy@cisco.com
	Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
	Subject: RE: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
	
	

	Does this mean that none of the "intention" documents listed in
the previous agendas have made the cut?

	 

	Cheers

	James

	 

	 

	
________________________________


	From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
	Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2010 3:29 AM
	To: br@brianrosen.net; fluffy@cisco.com
	Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
	Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3

	 

	--- I let the new chairs figure out how to arrange the items
properly but since I had written the mail already find my response
below. 

	Let us take a look at the list of WG items we have:
	
	Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of
Emergency Calling
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-14.txt>  (107967
bytes)
	Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-10.txt>  (96432
bytes)
	
	 --> Brian says he does not need time for the two items above.
	
	Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-04.txt>
(20127 bytes)
	
	 --> This document does not seem to require time. At least from
the IESG review feedback I have not seen anything dramatic.
	
	Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-specifying-holes-02.txt>
(22007 bytes)
	
	There were a punch of review comments but Martin did not send us
a request for a presentation. I assume that he feels comfortable
addressing the comments. Is this correct, Martin?
	
	Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol
based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-09.txt>  (50425
bytes)
	
	The comments on the list by Alex got addressed and I shipped a
new version. I don't believe it would make sense to discuss the comment
again.
	
	IANA Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace
for Local Emergency Communications
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-0
4.txt>  (19327 bytes)
	
	Marc is responsible for this work and I have not received a
request for a presentation slot.
	
	LoST Service List Boundary Extension
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03.txt
>  (26226 bytes)
	Using Imprecise Location for Emergency Context Resolution
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc-01.txt>  (39455
bytes)
	
	My understanding of the two documents from above is that they
are essentially done; we are only waiting for the feedback from the APPS
directorate on the Relax NG schema.
	
	Ciao
	Hannes
	
	Brian Rosen wrote: 

	I don't see any issues with -phonebcp and -framework that would
need meeting
	time.
	
	Brian
	
	
	On 3/12/10 6:09 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

	This is a lot of things to fit in 2.5 hours. It's possible that
if I saw how
	much time each had it would all look find but I'm very worried
about just
	starting new work and not finishing things. I want to be sure
there is no time
	required for any of the current WG items.
	
	Cullen
	
	
	On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

	ECRIT Meeting Agenda (Version 3)
	================================
	
	MONDAY, March 22, 2010
	0900-1130 Morning Session I
	Room: Palos Verdes
	
	* Agenda Bashing and Status Update (Marc, Hannes, Roger)
	
	* PSAP Callback (TBD)
	http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki> 
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback> 
	
	Intention: Discuss potential feedback from emergency services
groups on
	the requirements for this work.
	
	* Unauthenticated emergency services (Dirk)
	
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
> 
	
	Intention: Determine next steps. The group wants to work on it
but there
	are still lots of open issues and re-chartering is required to
add it to
	the milestone list.
	* Transformations ID (James P.)
	
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn> 
	
	Intention: TBD.
	
	* ECRIT Direct (James W.)
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct> 
	
	Intention: TBD.
	* Additional Data (Brian)
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data> 
	
	Intention: Initial document version. Presentation of the history
and the
	origin of the work. Determine interest.
	
	* Data Only Emergency Calls (Brian)
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea> 
	
	Intention: TBD.
	
	* Completing the Request Location (Brian)
	
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt> 
	
	Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this
document. The
	document is making a normative change to RFC 5222.
	
	* Service URN Update and Service Classification (Henning)
	
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification> 
	http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy> 
	Intention: Documents are a bit stuck although group agreed to
work on
	it. Henning will present a way forward.
	* Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE (Henning)
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt> 
	
	Intention: Discussion about what the group should do in this
area.
	
	* Describing Boundaries for Civic Addresse
	
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt> 
	
	Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this doc.
	_______________________________________________
	Ecrit mailing list
	Ecrit@ietf.org
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>  

	 

	Cullen Jennings
	For corporate legal information go to:
	
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> 
	
	
	
	_______________________________________________
	Ecrit mailing list
	Ecrit@ietf.org
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>