Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
"Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com> Tue, 16 March 2010 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72753A6BFD for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v18MXr5pr7tY for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmailgw2.commscope.com (csmailgw2.commscope.com [198.135.207.242]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A953A6BCF for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:63707 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw2.commscope.com with ESMTP id S187335Ab0CPQhz (ORCPT <rfc822; ecrit@ietf.org>); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:37:55 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC1.commscope.com (10.97.4.12) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:37:55 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC1.commscope.com ([fe80::8a9:4724:f6bb:3cdf%10]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:37:52 +0800
From: "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, "br@brianrosen.net" <br@brianrosen.net>, "fluffy@cisco.com" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:37:50 +0800
Thread-Topic: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
Thread-Index: AcrFJdI4HP6iOQKoTyiPsVP3yH77fwAARI5A
Message-ID: <5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601A@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBA6@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450255EBA6@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A55A45AE77F5941B18E5457ECAC81880120DDCE601ASISPE7MB1co_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw2.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: James.Winterbottom@andrew.com
Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:37:55 -0000
Does this mean that none of the "intention" documents listed in the previous agendas have made the cut? Cheers James ________________________________ From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2010 3:29 AM To: br@brianrosen.net; fluffy@cisco.com Cc: ecrit@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 --- I let the new chairs figure out how to arrange the items properly but since I had written the mail already find my response below. Let us take a look at the list of WG items we have: Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency Calling<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-14.txt> (107967 bytes) Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-10.txt> (96432 bytes) --> Brian says he does not need time for the two items above. Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-04.txt> (20127 bytes) --> This document does not seem to require time. At least from the IESG review feedback I have not seen anything dramatic. Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-specifying-holes-02.txt> (22007 bytes) There were a punch of review comments but Martin did not send us a request for a presentation. I assume that he feels comfortable addressing the comments. Is this correct, Martin? Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-09.txt> (50425 bytes) The comments on the list by Alex got addressed and I shipped a new version. I don't believe it would make sense to discuss the comment again. IANA Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-04.txt> (19327 bytes) Marc is responsible for this work and I have not received a request for a presentation slot. LoST Service List Boundary Extension<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03.txt> (26226 bytes) Using Imprecise Location for Emergency Context Resolution<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc-01.txt> (39455 bytes) My understanding of the two documents from above is that they are essentially done; we are only waiting for the feedback from the APPS directorate on the Relax NG schema. Ciao Hannes Brian Rosen wrote: I don't see any issues with -phonebcp and -framework that would need meeting time. Brian On 3/12/10 6:09 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: This is a lot of things to fit in 2.5 hours. It's possible that if I saw how much time each had it would all look find but I'm very worried about just starting new work and not finishing things. I want to be sure there is no time required for any of the current WG items. Cullen On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: ECRIT Meeting Agenda (Version 3) ================================ MONDAY, March 22, 2010 0900-1130 Morning Session I Room: Palos Verdes * Agenda Bashing and Status Update (Marc, Hannes, Roger) * PSAP Callback (TBD) http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback Intention: Discuss potential feedback from emergency services groups on the requirements for this work. * Unauthenticated emergency services (Dirk) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access Intention: Determine next steps. The group wants to work on it but there are still lots of open issues and re-chartering is required to add it to the milestone list. * Transformations ID (James P.) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-polk-ecrit-lost-transformations-urn Intention: TBD. * ECRIT Direct (James W.) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-ecrit-direct Intention: TBD. * Additional Data (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data Intention: Initial document version. Presentation of the history and the origin of the work. Determine interest. * Data Only Emergency Calls (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea Intention: TBD. * Completing the Request Location (Brian) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-completed-location-00.txt Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this document. The document is making a normative change to RFC 5222. * Service URN Update and Service Classification (Henning) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy Intention: Documents are a bit stuck although group agreed to work on it. Henning will present a way forward. * Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE (Henning) http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-ecrit-text-00.txt Intention: Discussion about what the group should do in this area. * Describing Boundaries for Civic Addresse http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-00.txt Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this doc. _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Agenda Version 3 Cullen Jennings